|
Document and Entity Information
|
9 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Nov. 13, 2013
|
|
| Document and Entity Information | ||
| Entity Registrant Name | DISH DBS CORP | |
| Entity Central Index Key | 0001042642 | |
| Document Type | 10-Q | |
| Document Period End Date | Sep. 30, 2013 | |
| Amendment Flag | false | |
| Current Fiscal Year End Date | --12-31 | |
| Entity Current Reporting Status | Yes | |
| Entity Filer Category | Non-accelerated Filer | |
| Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 1,015 | |
| Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2013 | |
| Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q3 |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
If the value is true, then the document is an amendment to previously-filed/accepted document. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
End date of current fiscal year in the format --MM-DD. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
This is focus fiscal period of the document report. For a first quarter 2006 quarterly report, which may also provide financial information from prior periods, the first fiscal quarter should be given as the fiscal period focus. Values: FY, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, H1, H2, M9, T1, T2, T3, M8, CY. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
This is focus fiscal year of the document report in CCYY format. For a 2006 annual report, which may also provide financial information from prior periods, fiscal 2006 should be given as the fiscal year focus. Example: 2006. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The end date of the period reflected on the cover page if a periodic report. For all other reports and registration statements containing historical data, it is the date up through which that historical data is presented. If there is no historical data in the report, use the filing date. The format of the date is CCYY-MM-DD. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The type of document being provided (such as 10-K, 10-Q, 485BPOS, etc). The document type is limited to the same value as the supporting SEC submission type, or the word "Other". No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
A unique 10-digit SEC-issued value to identify entities that have filed disclosures with the SEC. It is commonly abbreviated as CIK. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Indicate number of shares or other units outstanding of each of registrant's classes of capital or common stock or other ownership interests, if and as stated on cover of related periodic report. Where multiple classes or units exist define each class/interest by adding class of stock items such as Common Class A [Member], Common Class B [Member] or Partnership Interest [Member] onto the Instrument [Domain] of the Entity Listings, Instrument. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Indicate "Yes" or "No" whether registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. This information should be based on the registrant's current or most recent filing containing the related disclosure. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Indicate whether the registrant is one of the following: (1) Large Accelerated Filer, (2) Accelerated Filer, (3) Non-accelerated Filer, (4) Smaller Reporting Company (Non-accelerated) or (5) Smaller Reporting Accelerated Filer. Definitions of these categories are stated in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. This information should be based on the registrant's current or most recent filing containing the related disclosure. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The exact name of the entity filing the report as specified in its charter, which is required by forms filed with the SEC. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Carrying value as of the balance sheet date of liabilities incurred (and for which invoices have typically been received) and payable to vendors for goods and services received that are used in an entity's business. Used to reflect the current portion of the liabilities (due within one year or within the normal operating cycle if longer). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount for accounts payable to related parties. Used to reflect the current portion of the liabilities (due within one year or within the normal operating cycle if longer). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount due from customers or clients, within one year of the balance sheet date (or the normal operating cycle, whichever is longer), for goods or services (including trade receivables) that have been delivered or sold in the normal course of business, reduced to the estimated net realizable fair value by an allowance established by the entity of the amount it deems uncertain of collection. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of receivables arising from transactions with related parties due within one year or the normal operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Carrying value as of the balance sheet date of obligations incurred and payable, pertaining to costs that are statutory in nature, are incurred on contractual obligations, or accumulate over time and for which invoices have not yet been received or will not be rendered. Examples include taxes, interest, rent and utilities. Used to reflect the current portion of the liabilities (due within one year or within the normal operating cycle if longer). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Accumulated change in equity from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources, net of tax effect, at period end. Excludes Net Income (Loss), and accumulated changes in equity from transactions resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Includes foreign currency translation items, certain pension adjustments, unrealized gains and losses on certain investments in debt and equity securities, other than temporary impairment (OTTI) losses related to factors other than credit losses on available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities that an entity does not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell before recovery of the amortized cost basis, as well as changes in the fair value of derivatives related to the effective portion of a designated cash flow hedge. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Value received from shareholders in common stock-related transactions that are in excess of par value or stated value and amounts received from other stock-related transactions. Includes only common stock transactions (excludes preferred stock transactions). May be called contributed capital, capital in excess of par, capital surplus, or paid-in capital. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Sum of the carrying amounts as of the balance sheet date of all assets that are recognized. Assets are probable future economic benefits obtained or controlled by an entity as a result of past transactions or events. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Sum of the carrying amounts as of the balance sheet date of all assets that are expected to be realized in cash, sold, or consumed within one year (or the normal operating cycle, if longer). Assets are probable future economic benefits obtained or controlled by an entity as a result of past transactions or events. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Sum of the carrying amounts as of the balance sheet date of all assets that are expected to be realized in cash, sold or consumed after one year or beyond the normal operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of investment in debt and equity securities categorized neither as trading securities nor held-to-maturity securities and intended be sold or mature one year or operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of currency on hand as well as demand deposits with banks or financial institutions. Includes other kinds of accounts that have the general characteristics of demand deposits. Also includes short-term, highly liquid investments that are both readily convertible to known amounts of cash and so near their maturity that they present insignificant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest rates. Excludes cash and cash equivalents within disposal group and discontinued operation. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the caption on the face of the balance sheet to indicate that the entity has entered into (1) purchase or supply arrangements that will require expending a portion of its resources to meet the terms thereof, and (2) is exposed to potential losses or, less frequently, gains, arising from (a) possible claims against a company's resources due to future performance under contract terms, and (b) possible losses or likely gains from uncertainties that will ultimately be resolved when one or more future events that are deemed likely to occur do occur or fail to occur. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Aggregate par or stated value of issued nonredeemable common stock (or common stock redeemable solely at the option of the issuer). This item includes treasury stock repurchased by the entity. Note: elements for number of nonredeemable common shares, par value and other disclosure concepts are in another section within stockholders' equity. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The total amount of long-term liability charges that are being deferred beyond one year. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Total carrying amount of consideration received or receivable as of the balance sheet date on potential earnings that were not recognized as revenue or other forms of income in conformity with GAAP, and which are expected to be recognized as such within one year or the normal operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount after allocation of valuation allowances of deferred tax asset attributable to deductible temporary differences and carryforwards, net of deferred tax liability attributable to taxable temporary differences expected to be realized or consumed within one year or operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of deferred tax liability attributable to taxable temporary differences, net of deferred tax asset attributable to deductible temporary differences and carryforwards net of valuation allowances expected to be realized or consumed after one year (or the normal operating cycle, if longer). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of receivables due from an entity that is affiliated with the reporting entity by means of direct or indirect ownership, due within 1 year (or 1 business cycle). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Carrying amount (original costs adjusted for previously recognized amortization and impairment) as of the balance sheet date for the capitalized costs to acquire rights under a license arrangement (for example, to sell specified products in a specified territory) having an indefinite period of benefit. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Carrying value as of the balance sheet date of [accrued] interest payable on all forms of debt, including trade payables, that has been incurred and is unpaid. Used to reflect the current portion of the liabilities (due within one year or within the normal operating cycle if longer). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount after valuation and LIFO reserves of inventory expected to be sold, or consumed within one year or operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Sum of the carrying amounts as of the balance sheet date of all liabilities that are recognized. Liabilities are probable future sacrifices of economic benefits arising from present obligations of an entity to transfer assets or provide services to other entities in the future. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of liabilities and equity items, including the portion of equity attributable to noncontrolling interests, if any. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Total obligations incurred as part of normal operations that are expected to be paid during the following twelve months or within one business cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of obligation due after one year or beyond the normal operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Carrying amount of reserve for known or estimated probable loss from litigation, which may include attorneys' fees and other litigation costs, which is expected to be paid within one year of the date of the statement of financial position. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of long-term debt and capital lease obligation due after one year or beyond the normal operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of long-term debt and capital leases due within one year or the normal operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Total of all stockholders' equity (deficit) items, net of receivables from officers, directors, owners, and affiliates of the entity which is directly or indirectly attributable to that ownership interest in subsidiary equity which is not attributable to the parent (that is, noncontrolling interest, previously referred to as minority interest). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Carrying value as of the balance sheet date of obligations incurred through that date and payable arising from transactions not otherwise specified in the taxonomy. Used to reflect the current portion of the liabilities (due within one year or within the normal operating cycle if longer). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Aggregate carrying amount, as of the balance sheet date, of current assets not separately disclosed in the balance sheet. Current assets are expected to be realized or consumed within one year (or the normal operating cycle, if longer). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Aggregate carrying amount, as of the balance sheet date, of noncurrent assets not separately disclosed in the balance sheet. Noncurrent assets are expected to be realized or consumed after one year (or the normal operating cycle, if longer). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount after accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization of physical assets used in the normal conduct of business to produce goods and services and not intended for resale. Examples include, but are not limited to, land, buildings, machinery and equipment, office equipment, and furniture and fixtures. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The noncurrent cash, cash equivalents and investments that is restricted as to withdrawal or usage. Restrictions may include legally restricted deposits held as compensating balances against borrowing arrangements, contracts entered into with others, or entity statements of intention with regard to particular deposits classified as long-term; that is not expected to be released from such existing restrictions within one year of the balance sheet date or operating cycle, whichever is longer. Excludes compensating balance arrangements that are not agreements which legally restrict the use of cash amounts shown on the balance sheet. Includes noncurrent cash equivalents and investments that are similarly restricted as to withdrawal, usage or disposal. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The cumulative amount of the reporting entity's undistributed earnings or deficit. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Total of all stockholders' equity (deficit) items, net of receivables from officers, directors, owners, and affiliates of the entity which are attributable to the parent. The amount of the economic entity's stockholders' equity attributable to the parent excludes the amount of stockholders' equity which is allocable to that ownership interest in subsidiary equity which is not attributable to the parent (noncontrolling interest, minority interest). This excludes temporary equity and is sometimes called permanent equity. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of stockholders' equity (deficit), net of receivables from officers, directors, owners, and affiliates of the entity, attributable to both the parent and noncontrolling interests. Amount excludes temporary equity. Alternate caption for the concept is permanent equity. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) (USD $)
In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified |
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
|---|---|---|
| Current Assets: | ||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts on trade accounts receivable - other | $ 16,237 | $ 13,834 |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts on trade accounts receivable - EchoStar | 0 | 0 |
| Noncurrent Assets: | ||
| Property and equipment, accumulated depreciation | $ 3,044,085 | $ 2,948,204 |
| Common stock, par value (in dollars per share) | $ 0.01 | $ 0.01 |
| Common stock, shares authorized | 1,000,000 | 1,000,000 |
| Common stock, shares issued | 1,015 | 1,015 |
| Common stock, shares outstanding | 1,015 | 1,015 |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable from related parties, current. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization for physical assets used in the normal conduct of business to produce goods and services. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
A valuation allowance for trade and other receivables due to an Entity within one year (or the normal operating cycle, whichever is longer) that are expected to be uncollectible. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Face amount or stated value per share of common stock. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The maximum number of common shares permitted to be issued by an entity's charter and bylaws. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Total number of common shares of an entity that have been sold or granted to shareholders (includes common shares that were issued, repurchased and remain in the treasury). These shares represent capital invested by the firm's shareholders and owners, and may be all or only a portion of the number of shares authorized. Shares issued include shares outstanding and shares held in the treasury. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of shares of common stock outstanding. Common stock represent the ownership interest in a corporation. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the amount of subscriber promotions subsidies recognized in cost of sales. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Equipment sales and other revenue. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Equipment sales, services and other revenue related party. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
General and administrative expenses, related party. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Income (loss) before income taxes. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Other subscriber promotion subsidies. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Satellite and transmission expenses, other. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Satellite and transmission expenses, related party. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount after tax of increase (decrease) in equity from transactions and other events and circumstances from net income and other comprehensive income, attributable to parent entity. Excludes changes in equity resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount after tax of (increase) decrease in equity from transactions and other events and circumstances from net income and other comprehensive income, attributable to noncontrolling interests. Excludes changes in equity resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount after tax of increase (decrease) in equity from transactions and other events and circumstances from net income and other comprehensive income. Excludes changes in equity resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The aggregate costs related to goods produced and sold and services rendered by an entity during the reporting period. This excludes costs incurred during the reporting period related to financial services rendered and other revenue generating activities. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Costs incurred and are directly related to generating revenues in fulfilling customer subscriptions. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Total costs of sales and operating expenses for the period. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The aggregate expense recognized in the current period that allocates the cost of tangible assets, intangible assets, or depleting assets to periods that benefit from use of the assets. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in settlement of litigation and insurance claims. Excludes claims within an insurance entity's normal claims settlement process. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The aggregate total of expenses of managing and administering the affairs of an entity, including affiliates of the reporting entity, which are not directly or indirectly associated with the manufacture, sale or creation of a product or product line. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of current income tax expense (benefit) and deferred income tax expense (benefit) pertaining to continuing operations. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of the cost of borrowed funds accounted for as interest expense for debt. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount after accretion (amortization) of discount (premium), and investment expense, of interest income and dividend income on nonoperating securities. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of Net Income (Loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Net income after adjustments for dividends on preferred stock (declared in the period) and/or cumulative preferred stock (accumulated for the period). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The aggregate amount of income or expense from ancillary business-related activities (that is to say, excluding major activities considered part of the normal operations of the business). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The net result for the period of deducting operating expenses from operating revenues. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of tax expense (benefit), after reclassification adjustments, of appreciation (loss) in value of unsold available-for-sale securities. Excludes amounts related to other than temporary impairment (OTTI) loss. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount after tax and reclassification adjustments of other comprehensive income (loss). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount before tax and reclassification adjustments of unrealized holding gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Other costs incurred during the reporting period related to other revenue generating activities. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The net amount of other income and expense amounts, the components of which are not separately disclosed on the income statement, resulting from ancillary business-related activities (that is, excluding major activities considered part of the normal operations of the business) also known as other nonoperating income (expense) recognized for the period. Such amounts may include: (a) dividends, (b) interest on securities, (c) net gains or losses on securities, (d) unusual costs, (e) gains or losses on foreign exchange transactions, and (f) miscellaneous other income and expense items. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The consolidated profit or loss for the period, net of income taxes, including the portion attributable to the noncontrolling interest. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Total revenue from sale of goods and services rendered during the reporting period, in the normal course of business, reduced by sales returns and allowances, and sales discounts. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Revenue from circulation or sale of subscriptions (for example, but not limited to, subscriptions to a magazine or newspaper). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Cash paid for income taxes to parent. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Change in long-term deferred revenue, distribution and carriage payments and other long-term liabilities. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Funding of restricted debt escrow. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Proceeds from issuance of restricted debt. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Release of restricted debt escrow. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The increase during the period in capital lease obligations due to entering into new capital leases. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of currency on hand as well as demand deposits with banks or financial institutions. Includes other kinds of accounts that have the general characteristics of demand deposits. Also includes short-term, highly liquid investments that are both readily convertible to known amounts of cash and so near their maturity that they present insignificant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest rates. Excludes cash and cash equivalents within disposal group and discontinued operation. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of deferred income tax expense (benefit) pertaining to income (loss) from continuing operations. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The aggregate expense recognized in the current period that allocates the cost of tangible assets, intangible assets, or depleting assets to periods that benefit from use of the assets. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The cash outflow for the extinguishment of long-term borrowing, with the highest claim on the assets of the entity in case of bankruptcy or liquidation, before its maturity. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
This item represents the net total realized and unrealized gain (loss) included in earnings for the period as a result of selling or holding marketable securities categorized as trading, available-for-sale, or held-to-maturity, including the unrealized holding gain (loss) of held-to-maturity securities transferred to the trading security category and the cumulative unrealized gain (loss) which was included in other comprehensive income (a separate component of shareholders' equity) for available-for-sale securities transferred to trading securities during the period. Additionally, this item would include any gains (losses) realized during the period from the sale of investments accounted for under the cost method of accounting and losses recognized for other than temporary impairments (OTTI) of the subject investments. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The amount of cash paid during the current period to foreign, federal, state, and local authorities as taxes on income. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The increase (decrease) during the reporting period in other current operating assets less other current operating liabilities not separately disclosed in the statement of cash flows. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The increase (decrease) during the reporting period in other noncurrent operating assets not separately disclosed in the statement of cash flows. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The increase (decrease) during the reporting period in other assets used in operating activities less other operating liabilities used in operating activities not separately disclosed in the statement of cash flows. May include changes in other current assets and liabilities, other noncurrent assets and liabilities, or a combination of other current and noncurrent assets and liabilities. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The net cash inflow or outflow during the period for the aggregate increase (decrease) associated with funds and investments that are not available for withdrawal or use (such as assets held in escrow or contractually limited as to use or disposition) and are associated with underlying transactions that are classified as investing activities. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The amount of cash paid for interest during the period. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The increase (decrease) in cash associated with the entity's continuing operating, investing, and financing activities. While for technical reasons this element has no balance attribute, the default assumption is a debit balance consistent with its label. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of cash inflow (outflow) of financing activities, excluding discontinued operations. Financing activity cash flows include obtaining resources from owners and providing them with a return on, and a return of, their investment; borrowing money and repaying amounts borrowed, or settling the obligation; and obtaining and paying for other resources obtained from creditors on long-term credit. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of cash inflow (outflow) of investing activities, excluding discontinued operations. Investing activity cash flows include making and collecting loans and acquiring and disposing of debt or equity instruments and property, plant, and equipment and other productive assets. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of cash inflow (outflow) from operating activities, excluding discontinued operations. Operating activity cash flows include transactions, adjustments, and changes in value not defined as investing or financing activities. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The net cash outflow or inflow from other investing activities. This element is used when there is not a more specific and appropriate element in the taxonomy. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The cash outflow paid to third parties in connection with debt origination, which will be amortized over the remaining maturity period of the associated long-term debt. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Cash outflow for purchase of trading, available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The cash outflow associated with the acquisition of long-lived, physical assets that are used in the normal conduct of business to produce goods and services and not intended for resale; includes cash outflows to pay for construction of self-constructed assets. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Interest received on loans and other debt instruments during the current period. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The cash inflow from a borrowing with the highest claim on the assets of the entity in case of bankruptcy or liquidation (with maturities initially due after one year or beyond the operating cycle, if longer). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The net cash inflow or outflow from other financing activities. This element is used when there is not a more specific and appropriate element in the taxonomy. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The cash inflow associated with the aggregate amount received by the entity through sale or maturity of marketable securities (held-to-maturity or available-for-sale) during the period. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The consolidated profit or loss for the period, net of income taxes, including the portion attributable to the noncontrolling interest. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The cash outflow during the period from the repayment of aggregate short-term and long-term debt and payment of capital lease obligations. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The cash outflow for a long-term debt where the holder has highest claim on the entity's asset in case of bankruptcy or liquidation during the period. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The aggregate amount of noncash, equity-based employee remuneration. This may include the value of stock or unit options, amortization of restricted stock or units, and adjustment for officers' compensation. As noncash, this element is an add back when calculating net cash generated by operating activities using the indirect method. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Value of investments transferred to the entity's investments in noncash transactions. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Parenthetical)
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|---|---|
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS | |
| Interest rate (as a percent) | 7.00% |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Contractual interest rate for funds borrowed, under the debt agreement. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Organization and Business Activities
|
9 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|
| Organization and Business Activities | |
| Organization and Business Activities | 1. Organization and Business Activities
Principal Business
DISH DBS Corporation (which together with its subsidiaries is referred to as “DISH DBS,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and/or “our” unless otherwise required by the context) is a holding company and an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network Corporation (“DISH Network”). DISH DBS was formed under Colorado law in January 1996 and its common stock is held by DISH Orbital Corporation (“DOC”), a direct subsidiary of DISH Network. We operate the DISH® branded direct broadcast satellite (“DBS”) pay-TV service, which had 14.049 million subscribers in the United States as of September 30, 2013. The DISH branded pay-TV service consists of Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licenses authorizing us to use DBS and Fixed Satellite Service (“FSS”) spectrum, our owned and leased satellites, receiver systems, third party broadcast operations, customer service facilities, a leased fiber network, in-home service and call center operations, and certain other assets utilized in our operations.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The entire disclosure for organization, consolidation and basis of presentation of financial statements disclosure. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
9 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|
| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information. Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements prepared under GAAP. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Our results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (“2012 10-K”). Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Principles of Consolidation
We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries, investments in entities in which we have controlling influence and variable interest entities where we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary. Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee. When we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the cost method is used. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense for each reporting period. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things, allowances for doubtful accounts, self-insurance obligations, deferred taxes and related valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, loss contingencies, fair value of financial instruments, fair value of options granted under our stock-based compensation plans, fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, fair value of multi-element arrangements, capital leases, asset impairments, estimates of future cash flows used to evaluate impairments, useful lives of property, equipment and intangible assets, retailer incentives, programming expenses, subscriber lives and royalty obligations. Weak economic conditions have increased the inherent uncertainty in the estimates and assumptions indicated above. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected prospectively in the period they occur.
Fair Value Measurements
We determine fair value based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Market or observable inputs are the preferred source of values, followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. We apply the following hierarchy in determining fair value:
· Level 1, defined as observable inputs being quoted prices in active markets for identical assets, including U.S. treasury notes;
· Level 2, defined as observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
· Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other participants therefore requiring assumptions based on the best information available.
As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, marketable investment securities, trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts), and current liabilities (excluding the “Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations”) is equal to or approximates fair value due to their short-term nature or proximity to current market rates. See Note 3 for the fair value of our marketable investment securities.
Fair values for our publicly traded debt securities are based on quoted market prices, when available. The fair values of private debt are estimated based on an analysis in which we evaluate market conditions, related securities, various public and private offerings, and other publicly available information. In performing this analysis, we make various assumptions regarding, among other things, credit spreads, and the impact of these factors on the value of the debt securities. See Note 6 for the fair value of our long-term debt.
Advertising Costs
Our advertising costs associated with acquiring new Pay-TV subscribers are expensed as incurred. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we recorded advertising costs of $111 million and $123 million, respectively, and during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we recorded advertising costs of $344 million and $330 million, respectively. Advertising costs are included in “Other subscriber acquisition costs” and “General and administrative expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Deferred Cost of Sales
On May 22, 2013, we launched a promotion whereby qualifying new Pay-TV subscribers may choose either an Apple® iPad® 2 or programming credits when they, among other things, commit to a two-year contract. The costs of the iPad 2 are recorded as short-term or long-term deferred cost of sales expense within “Other current assets” and “Other noncurrent assets, net,” respectively, on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the related contract term to “Cost of sales — equipment, services and other” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
New Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit when a Net Operating Loss Carryforward or Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. ASU 2013-11 requires that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions. This standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2013-11 to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The entire disclosure for all significant accounting policies of the reporting entity. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Marketable Investment Securities and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marketable Investment Securities and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marketable Investment Securities and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents | 3. Marketable Investment Securities and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents
Our marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents consisted of the following:
(1) Restricted marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents are included in “Restricted cash and marketable investment securities” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Marketable Investment Securities
Our marketable investment securities portfolio consists of various debt and equity instruments, all of which are classified as available-for-sale.
Current Marketable Investment Securities - VRDNs
Variable rate demand notes (“VRDNs”) are long-term floating rate municipal bonds with embedded put options that allow the bondholder to sell the security at par plus accrued interest. All of the put options are secured by a pledged liquidity source. Our VRDN portfolio is comprised mainly of investments in municipalities, which are backed by financial institutions or other highly rated obligors that serve as the pledged liquidity source. While they are classified as marketable investment securities, the put option allows VRDNs to be liquidated generally on a same day or on a five business day settlement basis.
Current Marketable Investment Securities — Other
Our current marketable investment securities portfolio includes investments in various debt and equity instruments including corporate bonds.
Restricted Cash and Marketable Investment Securities
As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, our restricted marketable investment securities, together with our restricted cash, included amounts required as collateral for our letters of credit or surety bonds and for litigation. During the first quarter 2013, we released $42 million of restricted cash related to litigation. See Note 8 for further information.
Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Marketable Investment Securities
As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had accumulated net unrealized gains of $14 million and $7 million, respectively. These amounts, net of related tax effect, were $11 million and $6 million, respectively. All of these amounts are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)” within “Total stockholder’s equity (deficit).” The components of our available-for-sale investments are summarized in the table below.
(1) In connection with certain commercial arrangements that we entered into during the third quarter 2012, among other things, we received shares of common stock from a single issuer for no cash consideration.
As of September 30, 2013, restricted and non-restricted marketable investment securities included debt securities of $3.398 billion with contractual maturities within one year and $620 million with contractual maturities after one year through five years. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities as a result of our ability to sell these securities prior to maturity.
Marketable Investment Securities in a Loss Position
The following table reflects the length of time that the individual securities, accounted for as available-for-sale, have been in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by investment category. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the unrealized losses on our investments in debt securities primarily represent investments in corporate bonds. We have the ability to hold and do not intend to sell our investments in these debt securities before they recover or mature, and it is more likely than not that we will hold these investments until that time. In addition, we are not aware of any specific factors indicating that the underlying issuers of these debt securities would not be able to pay interest as it becomes due or repay the principal at maturity. Therefore, we believe that these changes in the estimated fair values of these marketable investment securities are related to temporary market fluctuations.
Fair Value Measurements
Our investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we had no transfers in or out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The entire disclosure for cash, cash equivalents, investments in debt and equity instruments (including cost and equity investees and related income statement amounts), equity and cost method investments, investments in joint ventures and any other investment. No definition available.
|
|
Inventory
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventory | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventory | 4. Inventory
Inventory consisted of the following:
(1) The increase in “Total inventory” as of September 30, 2013 primarily related to an increase in Hopper® set-top boxes and broadband equipment.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The entire disclosure for inventory. This may include, but is not limited to, the basis of stating inventory, the method of determining inventory cost, the major classes of inventory, and the nature of the cost elements included in inventory. If inventory is stated above cost, accrued net losses on firm purchase commitments for inventory and losses resulting from valuing inventory at the lower-of-cost-or-market may also be included. For LIFO inventory, may disclose the amount and basis for determining the excess of replacement or current cost over stated LIFO value and the effects of a LIFO quantities liquidation that impacts net income. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Property and Equipment
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Property and Equipment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Property and Equipment | 5. Property and Equipment
Depreciation and amortization expense consisted of the following:
(1) During the second quarter 2012, we recorded $68 million of “Depreciation and amortization” expense related to the termination of the license by the FCC for use the 148 degree orbital location.
Cost of sales and operating expense categories included in our accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) do not include depreciation expense related to satellites or equipment leased to customers.
DBS Satellites. We currently utilize 15 satellites in geostationary orbit approximately 22,300 miles above the equator, six of which we own and depreciate over the useful life of each satellite. We currently utilize capacity on seven satellites from EchoStar, which are accounted for as operating leases. See Note 10 for further discussion of our satellite leases with EchoStar. We also lease two satellites from third parties, which are accounted for as capital leases and are depreciated over the shorter of the economic life of the satellite or the term of the satellite agreement.
EchoStar XVIII Launch Service. Pursuant to the Professional Services Agreement DISH Network entered into with EchoStar in 2010, DISH Network has the right, but not the obligation, to engage EchoStar to manage the process of procuring new satellite capacity for it, which includes the procurement of satellite launch services. During November 2012, EchoStar entered into an agreement with ArianeSpace S.A. (“Ariane”) for certain launch services, pursuant to which DISH Network was designated in September 2013 by EchoStar to receive certain launch services from Ariane. During October 2013, DISH Network entered into an agreement directly with Ariane for these launch services. In total, DISH Network expects to pay EchoStar and Ariane approximately $120 million for these launch services. DISH Network plans to use these launch services for EchoStar XVIII, a DBS satellite with spot beam technology designed, among other things, for HD programming. EchoStar XVIII is expected to be launched during 2015.
Satellite Anomalies. Operation of our DISH branded pay-TV service requires that we have adequate DBS satellite transmission capacity for the programming we offer. Moreover, current competitive conditions require that we continue to expand our offering of new programming. While we generally have had in-orbit DBS satellite capacity sufficient to transmit our existing channels and some backup capacity to recover the transmission of certain critical programming, our backup capacity is limited.
In the event of a failure or loss of any of our satellites, we may need to acquire or lease additional satellite capacity or relocate one of our other satellites and use it as a replacement for the failed or lost satellite. Such a failure could result in a prolonged loss of critical programming or a significant delay in our plans to expand programming as necessary to remain competitive and thus may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Prior to 2013, certain of our owned and leased satellites have experienced anomalies, some of which have had a significant adverse impact on their remaining useful life and/or commercial operation. There can be no assurance that future anomalies will not further impact the remaining useful life and/or commercial operation of any of the satellites in our fleet. See “Long-Lived DBS Satellite Assets” below for further discussion of evaluation of impairment of our DISH branded pay-TV DBS satellite fleet. There can be no assurance that we can recover critical transmission capacity in the event one or more of our in-orbit satellites were to fail. We generally do not carry commercial insurance for any of the in-orbit satellites that we use, other than certain satellites leased from third parties, and therefore, we will bear the risk associated with any uninsured in-orbit satellite failures. Recent developments with respect to certain of our satellites are discussed below.
Leased Satellites
EchoStar XII. Prior to 2010, EchoStar XII experienced anomalies resulting in the loss of electrical power available from its solar arrays, which reduced the number of transponders that could be operated. In September 2012, November 2012, and January 2013, EchoStar XII experienced additional solar array anomalies, which further reduced the electrical power available. During the third quarter 2013, EchoStar informed us that EchoStar XII will likely experience further loss of available electrical power that will impact its operational capability, and EchoStar reduced the remaining estimated useful life of the satellite to 18 months. Pursuant to our satellite lease agreement with EchoStar, we are entitled to a reduction in our monthly recurring lease payments in the event of a partial loss of satellite capacity or complete failure of the satellite. Since the number of useable transponders on EchoStar XII depends on, among other things, whether EchoStar XII is operated in CONUS, spot beam, or hybrid CONUS/spot beam mode, we are unable to determine at this time the actual number of transponders that will be available at any given time or how many transponders can be used during the remaining estimated life of the satellite. This satellite is currently not in service and serves as an in-orbit spare.
Long-Lived DBS Satellite Assets. We evaluate our DISH branded pay-TV DBS satellite fleet for impairment as one asset group and test for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. While certain of the anomalies discussed above, and previously disclosed, may be considered to represent a significant adverse change in the physical condition of an individual satellite, based on the redundancy designed within each satellite and considering the asset grouping, these anomalies are not considered to be significant events that would require evaluation for impairment recognition. Unless and until a specific satellite is abandoned or otherwise determined to have no service potential, the net carrying amount related to the satellite would not be written off.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The entire disclosure for long-lived, physical assets used in the normal conduct of business and not intended for resale. Includes, but is not limited to, accounting policies and methodology, roll forwards, depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, including composite depreciation, accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, useful lives and method used, income statement disclosures, assets held for sale and public utility disclosures. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-Term Debt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-Term Debt | 6. Long-Term Debt
5% Senior Notes due 2017
On May 28, 2013, we issued $1.25 billion aggregate principal amount of our four-year, 5% Senior Notes due May 15, 2017 at an issue price of 100%. The net proceeds from the 5% Senior Notes due 2017 were placed into escrow to finance a portion of the cash consideration for DISH Network’s proposed merger with Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”). On June 21, 2013, DISH Network abandoned its efforts to acquire Sprint and, on June 24, 2013, we redeemed all of the 5% Senior Notes due 2017 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount of the 5% Senior Notes due 2017, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
During the second quarter 2013, we recorded $7 million in interest expense and deferred financing costs related to the issuance and redemption of our 5% Senior Notes due 2017 as “Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018
On April 5, 2013, we issued $1.2 billion aggregate principal amount of our five-year, 4 1/4% Senior Notes due April 1, 2018 at an issue price of 100%. Interest accrues at an annual rate of 4 1/4% and is payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing on October 1, 2013.
The 4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018 are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a “make-whole” premium, as defined in the related indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to April 1, 2016, we may also redeem up to 35.0% of the 4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018 at a specified premium with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings or capital contributions.
The 4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018 are:
· general unsecured senior obligations of DISH DBS; · ranked equally in right of payment with all of DISH DBS’ and the guarantors’ existing and future unsecured senior debt; and · ranked effectively junior to DISH DBS’ and the guarantors’ current and future secured senior indebtedness up to the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness.
The indenture related to the 4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018 contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, impose limitations on the ability of DISH DBS and its restricted subsidiaries to:
· incur additional debt; · pay dividends or make distributions on DISH DBS’ capital stock or repurchase DISH DBS’ capital stock; · make certain investments; · create liens or enter into sale and leaseback transactions; · enter into transactions with affiliates; · merge or consolidate with another company; and · transfer or sell assets.
In the event of a change of control, as defined in the related indenture, we would be required to make an offer to repurchase all or any part of a holder’s 4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018 at a purchase price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon, to the date of repurchase.
5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020
On April 5, 2013, we issued $1.1 billion aggregate principal amount of our seven-year, 5 1/8% Senior Notes due May 1, 2020 at an issue price of 100%. Interest accrues at an annual rate of 5 1/8% and is payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing on November 1, 2013.
The 5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020 are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a “make-whole” premium, as defined in the related indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to May 1, 2016, we may also redeem up to 35.0% of the 5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020 at a specified premium with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings or capital contributions.
The 5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020 are:
· general unsecured senior obligations of DISH DBS; · ranked equally in right of payment with all of DISH DBS’ and the guarantors’ existing and future unsecured senior debt; and · ranked effectively junior to DISH DBS’ and the guarantors’ current and future secured senior indebtedness up to the value of the collateral securing such indebtedness.
The indenture related to the 5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020 contains restrictive covenants that, among other things, impose limitations on the ability of DISH DBS and its restricted subsidiaries to:
· incur additional debt; · pay dividends or make distributions on DISH DBS’ capital stock or repurchase DISH DBS’ capital stock; · make certain investments; · create liens or enter into sale and leaseback transactions; · enter into transactions with affiliates; · merge or consolidate with another company; and · transfer or sell assets.
In the event of a change of control, as defined in the related indenture, we would be required to make an offer to repurchase all or any part of a holder’s 5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020 at a purchase price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount thereof, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon, to the date of repurchase.
6 1/4% Senior Notes due 2023
On May 28, 2013, we issued $1.35 billion aggregate principal amount of our ten-year, 6 1/4% Senior Notes due May 15, 2023 at an issue price of 100%. The net proceeds from the 6 1/4% Senior Notes due 2023 were placed into escrow to finance a portion of the cash consideration for DISH Network’s proposed merger with Sprint. On June 21, 2013, DISH Network abandoned its efforts to acquire Sprint and, on June 24, 2013, we redeemed all of the 6 1/4% Senior Notes due 2023 at a redemption price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the 6 1/4% Senior Notes due 2023, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
During the second quarter 2013, we recorded $23 million in premiums, interest expense and deferred financing costs related to the issuance and redemption of our 6 1/4% Senior Notes due 2023 as “Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
Fair Value of our Long-Term Debt
The following table summarizes the carrying and fair values of our debt facilities as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
(1) During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we repurchased $49 million of our 7% Senior Notes due 2013 in open market transactions. On October 1, 2013, we redeemed the remaining $451 million principal balance of our 7% Senior Notes due 2013. (2) Disclosure regarding fair value of capital leases is not required.
We estimated the fair value of our publicly traded long-term debt using market prices in less active markets (Level 2).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The entire disclosure for long-term debt. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-Based Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-Based Compensation | 7. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock Incentive Plans
DISH Network maintains stock incentive plans to attract and retain officers, directors and key employees. Our employees participate in the DISH Network stock incentive plans. Stock awards under these plans include both performance and non-performance based stock incentives. As of September 30, 2013, there were outstanding under these plans stock options to acquire 12.3 million shares of DISH Network’s Class A common stock and 1.9 million restricted stock units associated with our employees. Stock options granted prior to September 30, 2013 were granted with exercise prices equal to or greater than the market value of DISH Network Class A common stock at the date of grant and with a maximum term of approximately ten years. While historically DISH Network has issued stock awards subject to vesting, typically at the rate of 20% per year, some stock awards have been granted with immediate vesting and other stock awards vest only upon the achievement of certain DISH Network-specific subscriber, operational and/or financial goals. As of September 30, 2013, DISH Network had 69.7 million shares of its Class A common stock available for future grant under its stock incentive plans.
On December 28, 2012, DISH Network paid a dividend in cash of $1.00 per share on its outstanding Class A and Class B common stock to shareholders of record on December 14, 2012. In light of such dividend, during January 2013, the exercise price of 12.9 million stock options, affecting approximately 400 of our employees, was reduced by $0.77 per share (the “2012 Stock Option Adjustment”). Except as noted below, all information discussed below reflects the 2012 Stock Option Adjustment.
On January 1, 2008, DISH Network completed the distribution of its technology and set-top box business and certain infrastructure assets (the “Spin-off”) into a separate publicly-traded company, EchoStar. In connection with the Spin-off, each DISH Network stock award was converted into an adjusted DISH Network stock award and a new EchoStar stock award consistent with the Spin-off exchange ratio. DISH Network is responsible for fulfilling all stock awards related to DISH Network common stock and EchoStar is responsible for fulfilling all stock awards related to EchoStar common stock, regardless of whether such stock awards are held by our or EchoStar’s employees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our stock-based compensation expense, resulting from stock awards outstanding at the Spin-off date, is based on the stock awards held by our employees regardless of whether such stock awards were issued by DISH Network or EchoStar. Accordingly, stock-based compensation that we expense with respect to EchoStar stock awards is included in “Additional paid-in capital” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of March 31, 2013, we have recognized all of our stock-based compensation expense resulting from EchoStar stock awards outstanding at the Spin-off date held by our employees except for the 2005 LTIP performance awards, which were determined not to be probable as of September 30, 2013. See discussion of the 2005 LTIP below.
The following stock awards were outstanding:
Stock Award Activity
DISH Network stock option activity associated with our employees was as follows:
(1) The beginning of period weighted-average exercise price of $18.99 does not reflect the 2012 Stock Option Adjustment, which occurred subsequent to December 31, 2012. (2) These stock options are included in the caption “Total options outstanding, end of period.” See discussion of the 2005 LTIP, 2013 LTIP and Other Employee Performance Awards below.
We realized tax benefits from stock awards exercised as follows:
Based on the closing market price of DISH Network Class A common stock on September 30, 2013, the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options associated with our employees was as follows:
DISH Network restricted stock unit activity associated with our employees was as follows:
(1) These Restricted Performance Units are included in the caption “Total restricted stock units outstanding, end of period.” See discussion of the 2005 LTIP, 2013 LTIP and Other Employee Performance Awards below.
Long-Term Performance-Based Plans
2005 LTIP. During 2005, DISH Network adopted a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan (the “2005 LTIP”). The 2005 LTIP provides stock options and restricted stock units, either alone or in combination, which vest over seven years at the rate of 10% per year during the first four years, and at the rate of 20% per year thereafter. Exercise of the stock awards is subject to the foregoing vesting schedule and a performance condition that a DISH Network-specific subscriber goal is achieved by March 31, 2015.
Contingent compensation related to the 2005 LTIP will not be recorded in our financial statements unless and until DISH Network concludes achievement of the performance condition is probable. Given the competitive nature of DISH Network’s business, small variations in subscriber churn, gross new subscriber activation rates and certain other factors can significantly impact subscriber growth. Consequently, while it was determined that achievement of the goal was not probable as of September 30, 2013, that assessment could change in the future.
If all of the stock awards under the 2005 LTIP were vested and the goal had been met or if DISH Network had determined that achievement of the goal was probable during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we would have recorded total non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for our employees as indicated in the table below. If the goal is met and there are unvested stock awards at that time, the vested amounts would be expensed immediately on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss), with the unvested portion recognized ratably over the remaining vesting period.
(1) Represents the amount of this award that has met the foregoing vesting schedule and would therefore vest upon achievement of the performance condition.
2008 LTIP. During 2008, DISH Network adopted a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan (the “2008 LTIP”). The 2008 LTIP provided stock options and restricted stock units, either alone or in combination, which vested based on DISH Network-specific subscriber and financial goals. As of June 30, 2013, 100% of the eligible 2008 LTIP awards had vested.
2013 LTIP. During 2013, DISH Network adopted a long-term, performance-based stock incentive plan (the “2013 LTIP”). The 2013 LTIP provides stock options and restricted stock units in combination, which vest based on DISH Network -specific subscriber and financial goals. Exercise of the stock awards is contingent on achieving these goals by September 30, 2022. Regardless of when achieved, no vesting will occur or payment will be made under the 2013 LTIP for any performance goals prior to March 31, 2014.
Although no awards vest until DISH Network attains the performance goals, compensation related to the 2013 LTIP will be recorded based on DISH Network’s assessment of the probability of meeting the goals. If the goals are probable of being achieved, we will begin recognizing the associated non-cash, stock-based compensation expense on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) over the estimated period to achieve the goal.
During the third quarter 2013, DISH Network determined that 20% of the 2013 LTIP performance goals were probable of achievement. As a result, we recorded non cash, stock based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, as indicated in the table below titled “Non Cash, Stock Based Compensation Expense Recognized.”
Other Employee Performance Awards. In addition to the above long-term, performance stock incentive plans, DISH Network has other stock awards that vest based on certain other DISH Network-specific subscriber, operational and/or financial goals. Exercise of these stock awards is contingent on achieving certain performance goals.
Additional compensation related to these awards will be recorded based on DISH Network’s assessment of the probability of meeting the remaining performance goals. If the remaining goals are probable of being achieved, we will begin recognizing the associated non-cash, stock-based compensation expense on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) over the estimated period to achieve the goal. See table below titled “Estimated Remaining Non-Cash, Stock-Based Compensation Expense.”
Although no awards vest until the performance goals are attained, DISH Network determined that certain goals were probable of achievement and, as a result, recorded non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, as indicated in the table below titled “Non-Cash, Stock-Based Compensation Expense Recognized.”
Given the competitive nature of DISH Network’s business, small variations in subscriber churn, gross new subscriber activation rates and certain other factors can significantly impact subscriber growth. Consequently, while it was determined that achievement of certain DISH Network-specific subscriber, operational and/or financial goals was not probable as of September 30, 2013, that assessment could change in the future.
The non-cash, stock-based compensation expense associated with these awards was as follows:
Of the 12.3 million stock options and 1.9 million restricted stock units outstanding under the DISH Network stock incentive plans associated with our employees as of September 30, 2013, the following awards were outstanding pursuant to the performance-based stock incentive plans:
Stock-Based Compensation
In connection with DISH Network’s 2012 Stock Option Adjustment, discussed previously, we recognized incremental non-cash, stock-based compensation expense of $4 million during the first quarter 2013 and will expense an additional $3 million over the remaining vesting period of the respective stock awards.
Total non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for all of our employees is shown in the following table and was allocated to the same expense categories as the base compensation for such employees:
As of September 30, 2013, our total unrecognized compensation cost related to the non-performance based unvested stock awards was $15 million. This cost is based on an estimated future forfeiture rate of approximately 3.7% per year and will be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately two years. Share-based compensation expense is recognized based on stock awards ultimately expected to vest and is reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Changes in the estimated forfeiture rate can have a significant effect on share-based compensation expense since the effect of adjusting the rate is recognized in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed.
Valuation
The fair value of each stock option granted for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 was originally estimated at the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following assumptions:
(1) During the three months ended September 30, 2013, there were no stock options granted. (2) During the three months ended September 30, 2012, all stock options granted had the same vesting period.
On December 28, 2012 and December 1, 2011, DISH Network paid a $1.00 and a $2.00 cash dividend per share on its outstanding Class A and Class B common stock, respectively. While DISH Network currently does not intend to declare additional dividends on its common stock, it may elect to do so from time to time. Accordingly, the dividend yield percentage used in the Black-Scholes option valuation model is set at zero for all periods. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded stock options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. Consequently, our estimate of fair value may differ from other valuation models. Further, the Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions. Changes in these subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.
We will continue to evaluate the assumptions used to derive the estimated fair value of DISH Network’s stock options as new events or changes in circumstances become known.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The entire disclosure for compensation-related costs for equity-based compensation, which may include disclosure of policies, compensation plan details, allocation of equity compensation, incentive distributions, equity-based arrangements to obtain goods and services, deferred compensation arrangements, employee stock ownership plan details and employee stock purchase plan details. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
9 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|
| Commitments and Contingencies | |
| Commitments and Contingencies | 8. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
Wireless Spectrum
On March 2, 2012, the FCC approved the transfer of 40 MHz of AWS-4 wireless spectrum licenses held by DBSD North America and TerreStar to DISH Network. On March 9, 2012, DISH Network completed the acquisitions of 100% of the equity of reorganized DBSD North America (the “DBSD Transaction”) and substantially all of the assets of TerreStar (the “TerreStar Transaction”), pursuant to which DISH Network acquired, among other things, certain satellite assets and wireless spectrum licenses held by DBSD North America and TerreStar. The total consideration to acquire the DBSD North America and TerreStar assets was approximately $2.860 billion.
DISH Network’s consolidated FCC applications for approval of the license transfers from DBSD North America and TerreStar were accompanied by requests for waiver of the FCC’s MSS “integrated service” and spare satellite requirements and various technical provisions. On March 21, 2012, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rule Making proposing the elimination of the integrated service, spare satellite and various technical requirements associated with the AWS-4 licenses. On December 11, 2012, the FCC approved rules that eliminated these requirements and gave notice of its proposed modification of DISH Network’s AWS-4 authorizations to, among other things, allow DISH Network to offer single-mode terrestrial terminals to customers who do not desire satellite functionality. On February 15, 2013, the FCC issued an order, which became effective on March 7, 2013, modifying DISH Network’s AWS-4 licenses to expand its terrestrial operating authority. The FCC’s order of modification has imposed certain limitations on the use of a portion of this spectrum, including interference protections for other spectrum users and power and emission limits that DISH Network presently believes could render 5 MHz of its uplink spectrum (2000-2005 MHz) effectively unusable for terrestrial services and limit its ability to fully utilize the remaining 15 MHz of its uplink spectrum (2005-2020 MHz) for terrestrial services. These limitations could, among other things, impact the ongoing development of technical standards associated with DISH Network’s wireless business, and may have a material adverse effect on DISH Network’s ability to commercialize these licenses. The new rules also mandated certain interim and final build-out requirements for the licenses. By March 2017, DISH Network must provide terrestrial signal coverage and offer terrestrial service to at least 40% of the aggregate population represented by all of the areas covered by the licenses (the “AWS-4 Interim Build-Out Requirement”). By March 2020, DISH Network must provide terrestrial signal coverage and offer terrestrial service to at least 70% of the population in each area covered by an individual license (the “AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement”). Based on an extension request DISH Network filed with the FCC, as discussed below, these build-out requirements may change. In addition, the FCC has adopted rules for a spectrum band that is adjacent to DISH Network’s AWS-4 licenses, known as the “H Block.” Depending on the outcome of the standard-setting process for the H Block, the rules that the FCC adopted could further impact the remaining 15 MHz of DISH Network’s uplink spectrum (2005-2020 MHz), which may have a material adverse effect on DISH Network’s ability to commercialize the AWS-4 licenses.
In 2008, DISH Network paid $712 million to acquire certain 700 MHz wireless spectrum licenses, which were granted to DISH Network by the FCC in February 2009. At the time they were granted, these licenses were subject to certain interim and final build-out requirements. By June 2013, DISH Network was required to provide signal coverage and offer service to at least 35% of the geographic area in each area covered by each individual license (the “700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement”). By June 2019, DISH Network was required to provide signal coverage and offer service to at least 70% of the geographic area in each area covered by each individual license (the “700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement”). As discussed below, these requirements have since been modified by the FCC.
On September 9, 2013, DISH Network filed a letter with the FCC in support of a voluntary industry solution to resolve certain interoperability issues affecting the lower 700 MHz spectrum band (the “Interoperability Solution”). In connection with DISH Network’s letter, DISH Network also filed a petition and an extension request with the FCC that outlined certain conditions upon which it would support the Interoperability Solution.
On October 29, 2013, the FCC issued an order approving the Interoperability Solution (the “Interoperability Solution Order”), which requires DISH Network to reduce power emissions on its 700 MHz licenses. As part of the Interoperability Solution Order, the FCC, among other things, approved DISH Network’s request to modify the 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement so that by March 2017 (rather than the previous deadline of June 2013), DISH Network must provide signal coverage and offer service to at least 40% of its total E Block population (the “Modified 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement”). The FCC also approved DISH Network’s request to modify the 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement so that by March 2021 (rather than the previous deadline of June 2019), DISH Network must provide signal coverage and offer service to at least 70% of the population in each of its E Block license areas (the “Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement”). These requirements replaced the previous build-out requirements associated with DISH Network’s 700 MHz licenses. While the modifications to DISH Network’s 700 MHz licenses would provide DISH Network additional time to complete the build-out requirements, the reduction in power emissions could have an adverse impact on DISH Network’s ability to fully utilize its 700 MHz licenses. If DISH Network fails to meet the Modified 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement, the Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement may be accelerated by one year, from March 2021 to March 2020, and DISH Network could face the reduction of license area(s). If DISH Network fails to meet the Modified 700 MHz Final Build-Out Requirement, DISH Network may be subject to automatic license termination for the geographic portion of each license in which it is not providing service.
Also in connection with DISH Network’s support of the Interoperability Solution, DISH Network requested that the FCC modify its AWS-4 spectrum licenses to provide flexibility to repurpose 20 MHz of DISH Network’s uplink spectrum (2000-2020 MHz) for downlink (the “AWS-4 Waiver”), and extend the AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement by one year to March 2021 (the “AWS-4 Extension”). The FCC, however, has not yet issued a ruling on the AWS-4 Waiver or the AWS-4 Extension, and DISH Network cannot predict the timing or outcome of any FCC action on the AWS-4 Waiver or the AWS-4 Extension. As a precaution, DISH Network intends to appeal the Interoperability Solution Order, reserving its right to withdraw the appeal in the event the FCC grants the AWS-4 Waiver and the AWS-4 Extension.
If the FCC grants the AWS-4 Extension and DISH Network fails to meet the AWS-4 Interim Build-Out Requirement, the AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement may be accelerated by one year, from March 2021 to March 2020. If DISH Network fails to meet the AWS-4 Final Build-Out Requirement, its terrestrial authorization for each license area in which it fails to meet the requirement may terminate.
In addition, contingent upon the FCC approving the AWS-4 Waiver and the AWS-4 Extension at least 30 days prior to the commencement of the FCC’s planned H Block auction, DISH Network agreed to participate in the H Block auction and bid at least a net clearing price equal to an aggregate nationwide reserve price established by the FCC, not to exceed $0.50 per MHz/POP (approximately $1.56 billion).
DISH Network will need to make significant additional investments or partner with others to, among other things, finance the commercialization and build-out requirements of these licenses and DISH Network’s integration efforts including compliance with regulations applicable to the acquired licenses. Depending on the nature and scope of such commercialization, build-out, and integration efforts, any such investment or partnership could vary significantly. We have made cash distributions to DISH Network to finance the acquisition of these licenses and may make additional cash distributions to, among other things, finance the acquisition of additional licenses and the commercialization and build-out requirements of the acquired licenses and DISH Network’s integration efforts including compliance with regulations applicable to the acquired licenses. There can be no assurance that DISH
Network will be able to develop and implement a business model that will realize a return on these spectrum licenses or that DISH Network will be able to profitably deploy the assets represented by these spectrum licenses.
LightSquared LP
On July 23, 2013, L-Band Acquisition, LLC (“LBAC”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of DISH Network, formed to make a bid to acquire assets of LightSquared LP, entered into a Plan Support Agreement (the “PSA”) with certain senior secured lenders to LightSquared LP, which contemplates the purchase by LBAC of substantially all of the assets of the LightSquared LP Entities (as defined below) for a purchase price of $2.22 billion in cash, plus the assumption of certain liabilities pursuant to the terms and conditions of a proposed asset purchase agreement (the “Proposed APA”). SP Special Opportunities, LLC, an entity controlled by Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, is a senior secured lender to LightSquared LP and holds a substantial portion of LightSquared LP’s senior secured debt. DISH Network is a party to the PSA solely with respect to certain guaranty obligations. DISH Network’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) approved entering into the PSA, which would implement the Proposed APA, based, among other things, on the recommendation of a special committee of the Board (the “Special Committee”) and a fairness opinion that was prepared by a financial advisory firm at the request of the Special Committee.
Pursuant to the PSA, LBAC and such lenders have agreed, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, to support and pursue confirmation of a plan of reorganization (the “LightSquared LP Plan”) for LightSquared LP and certain of its subsidiaries that are debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “LightSquared LP Entities”) in pending bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”), which cases are jointly administered under the caption In re LightSquared Inc., et. al., Case No. 12-12080 (SCC).
LBAC’s purchase offer under the LightSquared LP Plan is subject to the submission of higher and better offers in accordance with certain bid procedures that were approved by the Bankruptcy Court on October 1, 2013 as further discussed below. In addition, the LightSquared LP Plan is subject to confirmation by the Bankruptcy Court. The Proposed APA has not been accepted or executed by the LightSquared LP Entities. Consummation of the acquisition contemplated under the Proposed APA is subject to, among other things, Bankruptcy Court, FCC and Canadian federal Department of Industry (“Industry Canada”) approvals. However, funding of the purchase price under the Proposed APA is not conditioned upon receipt of approvals from the FCC or Industry Canada. DISH Network would be a party to the Proposed APA solely with respect to certain guaranty obligations.
On August 6, 2013, Harbinger Capital Partners LLC and other affiliates of Harbinger (collectively, “Harbinger”), the majority and controlling shareholders of LightSquared Inc. and its subsidiaries, filed an adversary proceeding against DISH Network, LBAC, EchoStar, Charles W. Ergen (our Chairman), other affiliates of Mr. Ergen, and certain other parties, in the Bankruptcy Court. On October 29, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed all of the claims in Harbinger’s adversary proceeding in their entirety. See “Contingencies” in this Note 8 for further information.
On October 1, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order confirming LBAC as a qualified bidder and establishing certain bid protections for LBAC, including payment of a break-up fee of $52 million and reimbursement of expenses of up to $2 million in the event LBAC is not the successful bidder at auction. Further, the Bankruptcy Court’s order established, among other things: (i) bid procedures for the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the LightSquared LP Entities; (ii) November 20, 2013 as the deadline for potential bidders to submit bids (the “Bid Deadline”), subject to extension under certain circumstances, but in no event beyond November 25, 2013; and (iii) if a qualified bid is received prior to the Bid Deadline, November 25, 2013 as the date to hold an auction to solicit higher or otherwise better bids for the LightSquared LP Entities’ assets, subject to extension under certain circumstances, but in no event beyond December 6, 2013. The Bankruptcy Court also scheduled a confirmation hearing on December 10, 2013 to consider the sale of the LightSquared LP Entities’ assets.
We may make cash distributions to DISH Network to, among other things, finance the proposed purchase by LBAC of substantially all of the assets of the LightSquared LP Entities and to finance the commercialization and build-out requirements of the acquired licenses and DISH Network’s integration efforts including compliance with regulations applicable to the acquired licenses. There can be no assurance that DISH Network will ultimately be able to complete the acquisition contemplated under the Proposed APA. Further, to the extent that DISH Network completes the acquisition contemplated under the Proposed APA, there can be no assurance that DISH Network would be able to develop and implement a business model that would realize a return on the acquired assets or that DISH Network would be able to profitably deploy the acquired assets. If DISH Network is unable to successfully address these challenges and risks, its business, financial condition or results of operations could suffer.
Furthermore, if DISH Network enters into the Proposed APA, funding of the purchase price is not conditioned upon receipt of approvals from the FCC or Industry Canada. If the required approvals are not obtained, subject to certain exceptions, DISH Network would have the right to direct and require a sale of some or all of the assets of the LightSquared LP Entities to a third party and DISH Network would be entitled to the proceeds of such a sale. These proceeds could, however, be substantially less than DISH Network’s proposed funding for the purchase. Therefore, if DISH Network fails to obtain these necessary regulatory approvals, it may suffer significant financial losses.
Guarantees
In connection with the Spin-off, we distributed certain satellite lease agreements to EchoStar and remained the guarantor under those capital leases for payments totaling approximately $63 million over approximately the next 17 months.
In addition, during the third quarter 2009, EchoStar entered into a new satellite transponder service agreement for Nimiq 5 through 2024. We sublease this capacity from EchoStar and DISH Network guarantees a certain portion of EchoStar’s obligation under their satellite transponder service agreement through 2019. As of September 30, 2013, the remaining obligation of DISH Network’s guarantee is $391 million.
As of September 30, 2013, we have not recorded a liability on the balance sheet for any of these guarantees.
Contingencies
Separation Agreement
In connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network entered into a separation agreement with EchoStar that provides, among other things, for the division of certain liabilities, including liabilities resulting from litigation. Under the terms of the separation agreement, EchoStar has assumed certain liabilities that relate to its business including certain designated liabilities for acts or omissions that occurred prior to the Spin-off. Certain specific provisions govern intellectual property related claims under which, generally, EchoStar will only be liable for its acts or omissions following the Spin-off and DISH Network will indemnify EchoStar for any liabilities or damages resulting from intellectual property claims relating to the period prior to the Spin-off as well as our acts or omissions following the Spin-off.
Litigation
We are involved in a number of legal proceedings (including those described below) concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of our business activities. Many of these proceedings are at preliminary stages, and many of these proceedings seek an indeterminate amount of damages. We regularly evaluate the status of the legal proceedings in which we are involved to assess whether a loss is probable or there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may have been incurred and to determine if accruals are appropriate. If accruals are not appropriate, we further evaluate each legal proceeding to assess whether an estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss can be made.
For certain cases described on the following pages, management is unable to provide a meaningful estimate of the possible loss or range of possible loss because, among other reasons, (i) the proceedings are in various stages; (ii) damages have not been sought; (iii) damages are unsupported and/or exaggerated; (iv) there is uncertainty as to the outcome of pending appeals or motions; (v) there are significant factual issues to be resolved; and/or (vi) there are novel legal issues or unsettled legal theories to be presented or a large number of parties (as with many patent-related cases). For these cases, however, management does not believe, based on currently available information, that the outcomes of these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.
c4cast.com, Inc.
On May 7, 2012, c4cast.com, Inc. filed a complaint against DISH Network and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Blockbuster L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 7,958,204 (the “204 patent”), which is entitled “Community-Selected Content.” The 204 patent relates to systems, methods and techniques for providing resources to participants over an electronic network. On August 29, 2013, c4cast.com, Inc. dismissed the action with prejudice, pursuant to a settlement under which we made an immaterial payment in exchange for a license to EchoStar and us of certain patents and patent applications.
California Institute of Technology
On October 1, 2013, the California Institute of Technology (“Caltech”) filed complaints against DISH Network, its wholly-owned subsidiary, dishNET Satellite Broadband L.L.C., and our wholly-owned subsidiary, DISH Network L.L.C., as well as EchoStar subsidiaries, Hughes Communications, Inc. and Hughes Network Systems, LLC. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleges infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,116,710 (the “710 patent”), 7,421,032 (the “032 patent”), 7,916,781 (the “781 patent”) and 8,284,833 (the “833 patent”), each of which is entitled “Serial Concatenation of Interleaved Convolutional Codes forming Turbo-Like Codes.” Caltech alleges that encoding data as specified by the DVB-S2 standard infringes each of the asserted patents.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Custom Media Technologies LLC
On August 15, 2013, Custom Media Technologies LLC (“Custom Media Technologies”) filed complaints against DISH Network, AT&T, Inc., Charter Communications, Inc., Comcast Corp., Cox Communications, Inc., DirecTV, Time Warner Cable Inc. and Verizon Communications, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,269,275. The patent, which is entitled “Method and System for Customizing and Distributing Presentations for User Sites,” relates to the provision of customized presentations to viewers over a network, such as “a cable television network, an Internet or other computer network, a broadcast television network, and/or a satellite system.” Custom Media Technologies is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
ESPN
During 2008, our wholly-owned subsidiary, DISH Network L.L.C., filed a lawsuit against ESPN, Inc., ESPN Classic, Inc., ABC Cable Networks Group, Soapnet L.L.C. and International Family Entertainment (collectively, “ESPN”) for breach of contract in New York State Supreme Court. Our complaint alleges that ESPN failed to provide us with certain HD feeds of the Disney Channel, ESPN News, Toon and ABC Family. In October 2011, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, which the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department (the “First Department”) affirmed on April 2, 2013. We sought leave to further appeal, which the New York Court of Appeals denied on August 27, 2013 on jurisdictional grounds. On September 19, 2013, we appealed the trial court’s final judgment to the First Department. The parties have submitted a stipulation to adjourn our appeal pending resolution of a motion by ESPN to strike our appeal.
ESPN had asserted a counterclaim alleging that we owed approximately $35 million under the applicable affiliation agreements. On April 15, 2009, the New York State Supreme Court granted, in part, ESPN’s motion for summary judgment on the counterclaim, finding that we are liable for some of the amount alleged to be owing but that the actual amount owing is disputed. On December 29, 2010, the First Department affirmed the partial grant of ESPN’s motion for summary judgment on the counterclaim. After the partial grant of ESPN’s motion for summary judgment, ESPN sought an additional $30 million under the applicable affiliation agreements. On March 15, 2010, the New York State Supreme Court ruled that we owe the full amount of approximately $66 million under the applicable affiliation agreements. As of December 31, 2010, we had $42 million recorded as a “Litigation accrual” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
On June 21, 2011, the First Department affirmed the New York State Supreme Court’s ruling that we owe approximately $66 million under the applicable affiliation agreements and, on October 18, 2011, denied our motion for leave to appeal that decision to New York’s highest court, the New York Court of Appeals. We sought leave to appeal directly to the New York Court of Appeals and, on January 10, 2012, the New York Court of Appeals dismissed our motion for leave on the ground that the ruling upon which we appealed does not fully resolve all claims in the action. As a result of the First Department’s June 2011 ruling, during 2011, we recorded $24 million of “Litigation Expense” on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). On October 11, 2012, the New York State Supreme Court awarded ESPN $5 million in attorneys’ fees as the prevailing party on both our claim and ESPN’s counterclaim. As a result, we recorded $5 million of “General and administrative expenses” and increased our “Litigation accrual” to a total of $71 million related to this case as of December 31, 2012. During the first quarter 2013, we paid $71 million to ESPN related to the counterclaim and attorneys’ fees and $12 million for accrued interest, which amounts we may be able to recover if our further appeals are successful. We intend to vigorously prosecute and defend this case.
Garnet Digital, LLC
On September 9, 2013, Garnet Digital, LLC (“Garnet Digital”) filed a complaint against DISH Network and our wholly-owned subsidiary, DISH Network L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 5,379,421 (the “421 patent”), which is entitled “Interactive Terminal for the Access of Remote Database Information.” The 421 patent relates to methods for accessing information from a remote computerized database and related devices. On the same day, Garnet Digital filed similar complaints in the same court against 15 other defendants, including AT&T, Inc., Comcast Corp., DirecTV, TiVo, Inc., and Verizon Communications, Inc. Garnet Digital is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Harbinger Capital Partners LLC (LightSquared Bankruptcy)
On August 6, 2013, Harbinger filed an adversary proceeding against DISH Network, LBAC, EchoStar, Charles W. Ergen (our Chairman), other affiliates of Mr. Ergen, and certain other parties, in the LightSquared bankruptcy cases pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”), which cases are jointly administered under the caption In re LightSquared Inc., et. al., Case No. 12 12080 (SCC). Harbinger has alleged, among other things, claims based on fraud, unfair competition, civil conspiracy and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage related to certain purchases of LightSquared secured debt by SP Special Opportunities, LLC (“SPSO”), an entity controlled by Mr. Ergen. Subsequently, LightSquared intervened to join in certain claims alleged against certain defendants other than DISH Network, LBAC and EchoStar. Harbinger has alleged damages in excess of $4 billion.
On October 29, 2013, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed all of the claims in Harbinger’s adversary proceeding in their entirety. The Bankruptcy Court Judge granted leave for LightSquared to file an amended pleading solely related to certain contract and other related claims under the credit agreement pursuant to which SPSO made certain purchases of LightSquared secured debt and dismissed all other claims alleged by LightSquared in the adversary proceeding.
DISH Network and LBAC intend to vigorously defend this proceeding and cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of this proceeding or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
The Hopper Litigation
On May 24, 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, DISH Network L.L.C., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., CBS Corporation, Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., Fox Television Holdings, Inc., Fox Cable Network Services, L.L.C. and NBCUniversal, LLC. In the lawsuit, we are seeking a declaratory judgment that we are not infringing any defendant’s copyright, or breaching any defendant’s retransmission consent agreement, by virtue of the PrimeTime Anytime™ and AutoHop™ features of our Hopper® set-top box. A consumer can use the PrimeTime Anytime feature, at his or her option, to record certain primetime programs airing on ABC, CBS, Fox, and/or NBC up to every night, and to store those recordings for up to eight days. A consumer can use the AutoHop feature, at his or her option, to watch certain recordings the subscriber made with our PrimeTime Anytime feature, commercial-free, if played back the next day after the show’s original airing.
Later on May 24, 2012, (i) Fox Broadcasting Company, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Fox Television Holdings, Inc. filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature, the AutoHop feature, as well as Sling placeshifting functionality infringe their copyrights and breach their retransmission consent agreements, (ii) NBC Studios LLC, Universal Network Television, LLC, Open 4 Business Productions LLC and NBCUniversal LLC filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights, and (iii) CBS Broadcasting Inc., CBS Studios Inc. and Survivor Productions LLC filed a lawsuit against us and DISH Network L.L.C. in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, alleging that the PrimeTime Anytime feature and the AutoHop feature infringe their copyrights. The Central District of California matters have been assigned to a single judge, but remain separate cases.
As a result of certain parties’ competing venue-related motions brought in both the New York and California actions, and certain networks’ filing various counterclaims and amended complaints, the claims are presently pending in the following venues: (1) the copyright and contract claims regarding the ABC and CBS parties are pending in New York; and (2) the copyright and contract claims regarding the Fox and NBC parties are pending in California. The NBC plaintiffs and Fox plaintiffs have filed amended complaints in their respective California actions adding copyright claims against EchoStar and EchoStar Technologies L.L.C. (“EchoStar Technologies”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of EchoStar. In addition, the Fox plaintiffs’ amended complaint added claims challenging the Hopper Transfers™ feature of our second-generation Hopper set-top box. Additionally, both the ABC and CBS parties have filed counterclaims in the New York action adding copyright claims against EchoStar Technologies, and the CBS parties have filed a counterclaim alleging that we fraudulently concealed the AutoHop feature when negotiating renewal of our CBS retransmission consent agreement.
On November 7, 2012, the California court denied the Fox plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top box’s PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features. The Fox plaintiffs appealed and, on July 24, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of the Fox plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction as to the PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features. On August 7, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. On March 27, 2013, at the request of the parties, the Central District of California granted a stay of all proceedings in the action brought by the NBC plaintiffs, pending resolution of the appeal by the Fox plaintiffs.
On November 23, 2012, the ABC plaintiffs filed a motion in the New York action for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the Hopper set-top box’s PrimeTime Anytime and AutoHop features, and, on September 18, 2013, the New York court denied that motion. The ABC plaintiffs have filed a notice of appeal. On February 21, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a second motion for preliminary injunction against: (i) us seeking to enjoin the Hopper Transfers feature in our second-generation Hopper set-top box, alleging breach of their retransmission consent agreement; and (ii) us and EchoStar Technologies seeking to enjoin the Sling placeshifting functionality in our second-generation Hopper set-top box, alleging copyright infringement and breach of their retransmission consent agreement. On September 23, 2013, the California court denied the Fox plaintiffs’ motion and on October 22, 2013, the Fox plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal.
We intend to vigorously prosecute and defend our position in these cases. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted copyrights, or are in breach of any of the retransmission consent agreements, we may be subject to substantial damages, and/or an injunction that could require us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. In addition, as a result of this litigation, we may not be able to renew certain of our retransmission consent agreements and other programming agreements on favorable terms or at all. If we are unable to renew these agreements, there can be no assurance that we would be able to obtain substitute programming, or that such substitute programming would be comparable in quality or cost to our existing programming. Loss of access to existing programming could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations, including, among other things, our gross new subscriber activations and subscriber churn rate. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these suits or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
LightSquared Transaction Shareholder Derivative Actions
On August 9, 2013, an alleged shareholder of DISH Network, Jacksonville Police and Fire Pension Fund (“Jacksonville PFPF”), filed a putative shareholder derivative action in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty claims against the members of DISH Network’s Board of Directors as of that date: Charles W. Ergen; Joseph P. Clayton; James DeFranco; Cantey M. Ergen; Steven R. Goodbarn; David K. Moskowitz; Tom A. Ortolf; and Carl E. Vogel (collectively, the “Director Defendants”). In its operative amended complaint, Jacksonville PFPF claims that Mr. Ergen breached his fiduciary duty to DISH Network as a result of certain purchases of LightSquared debt by SPSO, an entity controlled by Mr. Ergen, and that the other Director Defendants aided and abetted that alleged breach of duty. Jacksonville PFPF claims that the debt purchases created a conflict of interest and allegedly put at risk DISH Network’s bid to acquire LightSquared’s spectrum assets at the auction that will occur in connection with the LightSquared bankruptcy proceeding. Jacksonville PFPF further claims that most members of DISH Network’s Board of Directors are not sufficiently independent from Mr. Ergen to guide DISH Network through the LightSquared auction process. Jacksonville PFPF is seeking an unspecified amount of damages and a preliminary injunction that would enjoin Mr. Ergen and all of the Director Defendants other than Mr. Goodbarn from influencing DISH Network’s ongoing efforts to acquire assets of LightSquared in the bankruptcy proceeding. The Court has set a hearing on the preliminary injunction motion for November 25, 2013. Jacksonville PFPF dismissed its claims against Mr. Goodbarn on October 8, 2013.
Five alleged shareholders have filed duplicative putative derivative complaints in state and federal courts alleging the same claims. On September 18, 2013, DCM Multi-Manager Fund, LLC filed a duplicative putative derivative complaint in the District Court for Clark County, Nevada, which was consolidated with the Jacksonville PFPF action on October 9, 2013. Between September 25, 2013 and October 2, 2013, City of Daytona Beach Police Officers and Firefighters Retirement System, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System and Iron Worker Mid-South Pension Fund filed duplicative putative derivative complaints in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Also on October 2, 2013, Iron Workers District Council (Philadelphia and Vicinity) Retirement and Pension Plan filed its complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. None of the plaintiffs in these actions is seeking a preliminary injunction. On October 11, 2013, Iron Worker Mid-South Pension Fund dismissed its claims without prejudice. On October 30, 2013, Louisiana Municipal Police Employees’ Retirement System dismissed its claims without prejudice.
DISH Network has established a Special Litigation Committee to review the factual allegations and legal claims in these actions. DISH Network cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these suits or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Norman IP Holdings, LLC
On September 15, 2011, Norman IP Holdings, LLC (“Norman”) filed a patent infringement complaint (the “2011 Action”) against Lexmark International Corporation (“Lexmark”) and Brother International Corporation (“Brother”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,592,555 (the “555 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 5,530,597 (the “597 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 5,502,689 (the “689 patent”) by Lexmark, and infringement of the 555 patent and the 689 patent by Brother. On January 27, 2012, Norman filed a second amended complaint in the 2011 Action that added DISH Network as a defendant, among others, in which it asserted the 555 patent and the 689 patent against us. On September 21, 2012, Norman served us with preliminary infringement contentions related to the 555 patent and the 689 patent, as well as the 597 patent, which outlined Norman’s claims with respect to certain DISH products. On February 8, 2013, Norman filed a third amended complaint in the 2011 Action, in which it added claims against us alleging infringement of the 597 patent. On April 8, 2013, Norman filed a fourth amended complaint in the 2011 Action, in which it added new claims against us alleging infringement of additional DISH products. On May 1, 2013, Norman filed a fifth amended complaint in the 2011 Action, in which it named Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Xerox Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc., and ZTE Solutions, Inc. as defendants, in addition to us. On July 9, 2013, the Court ordered Norman to file a new sixth amended complaint limiting Norman’s claims against us to those specifically referenced in its September 21, 2012 preliminary infringement contentions. As a result, on July 10, 2013, Norman filed a sixth amended complaint in the 2011 Action, in which it asserted claims against our wholly-owned subsidiary, DISH Network L.L.C., replacing DISH Network as defendant, alleging that the use of certain Broadcom chipsets in DISH DVR systems infringes the 689 patent. In addition, Norman withdrew all infringement claims against us regarding the 555 patent and the 597 patent. On July 12, 2013, we filed a motion to dismiss the 2011 Action, because Norman failed to comply with the Court’s July 9, 2013 order.
In addition, on May 10, 2013, Norman filed a separate patent infringement complaint (the “2013 Action”) against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, asserting infringement of the 555, 597 and 689 patents, as well as U.S. Patent No. 5,608,873 (the “873 patent”) and U.S. Patent Number 5,771,394 (the “394 patent”). The infringement claims asserted in the 2013 Action relate to different DISH products than Norman identified in the 2011 Action. On June 26, 2013, we filed a motion to dismiss the 2013 Action, because Norman failed to join necessary parties. Our motion to dismiss is pending, and no trial date has been set for the 2013 Action.
On October 18, 2013, the parties stipulated that Norman will dismiss all of its claims against DISH Network L.L.C. in the 2011 Action, and re-assert them in the 2013 Action. The 689 patent relates to a clock generator capable of shut-down mode and clock generation method, the 555 patent relates to a wireless communications privacy method and system, the 597 patent relates to an interrupt enable circuit that allows devices to exit processes without using a hardware reset, the 873 patent relates to a device and method for providing inter-processor communication in a multi-processor architecture, and the 394 patent relates to a servo loop control apparatus having a master microprocessor and at least one autonomous streamlined signal processor. Norman is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.
We intend to vigorously defend these cases. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could cause us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of these suits or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Olympic Developments AG, LLC
On January 20, 2011, Olympic Developments AG, LLC (“Olympic”) filed suit against our wholly-owned subsidiary, DISH Network L.L.C., Atlantic Broadband, Inc., Bright House Networks, LLC, Cable One, Inc., Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, CSC Holdings, LLC, GCI Communication Corp., Insight Communications Company, Inc., Knology, Inc., Mediacom Communications Corporation and RCN Telecom Services, LLC in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,475,585 and 6,246,400. The patents relate to on-demand services. Olympic is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. On June 13, 2011, the case was transferred to the Northern District of California. On November 7, 2011, the case was stayed pending reexamination by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. On March 12, 2013, Olympic voluntarily dismissed its claims against us without prejudice.
Personalized Media Communications, Inc.
During 2008, Personalized Media Communications, Inc. (“PMC”) filed suit against DISH Network, EchoStar and Motorola Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,109,414, 4,965,825, 5,233,654, 5,335,277, and 5,887,243, which relate to satellite signal processing. PMC is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. Subsequently, Motorola Inc. settled with PMC, leaving EchoStar and DISH Network as defendants. On July 18, 2012, pursuant to a Court order, PMC filed a Second Amended Complaint that added Rovi Guides, Inc. (f/k/a/ Gemstar-TV Guide International, Inc.) and TVG-PMC, Inc. (collectively, “Gemstar”) as a party, and added a new claim against all defendants seeking a declaratory judgment as to the scope of Gemstar’s license to the patents in suit, under which DISH Network and EchoStar are sublicensees. A new trial date has not yet been set.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could cause us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Pragmatus Telecom, LLC
On December 5, 2012, Pragmatus Telecom, LLC (“Pragmatus”) filed a patent infringement lawsuit against DISH Network in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging infringement of United States Patent Nos. 6,311,231, 6,668,286, and 7,159,043. Pragmatus alleges that the click-to-chat and click-to-call customer support features of the DISH website and call center management systems infringe these patents. Pragmatus has brought similar complaints against more than 40 other companies, including Comcast, AT&T, Sprint, Frontier Communications, Bright House, UPS, FedEx, GM and Ford. Pragmatus is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. On March 5, 2013, Pragmatus voluntarily dismissed with prejudice all claims in the action relating to allegedly infringing features provided by certain of our vendors. Pragmatus also voluntarily dismissed without prejudice all remaining claims in the action.
Premier International Associates, LLC
On August 3, 2012, Premier International Associates, LLC (“Premier International Associates”) filed a complaint against us, our wholly-owned subsidiary, DISH Network L.L.C., DISH Network and EchoStar and its wholly-owned subsidiary, EchoStar Technologies L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 6,243,725 (the “725 patent”), which is entitled “List Building System.” The 725 patent relates to a system for building an inventory of audio/visual works. Premier International Associates is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. On March 27, 2013, Premier International Associates dismissed the action against us and the EchoStar defendants with prejudice, pursuant to a settlement under which we and the EchoStar defendants made an immaterial payment in exchange for a license to certain patents and patent applications.
Preservation Technologies, LLC
In December 2011, Preservation Technologies, LLC (“Preservation Technologies”) filed suit against DISH Network in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. In the Operative Seventh Amended Complaint, filed on March 22, 2013, Preservation Technologies also names Netflix, Inc., Hulu, LLC, AT&T Services, Inc., Cox Communications, Inc., Disney Online, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Vudu, Inc. and ESPN Internet Ventures as defendants. Preservation Technologies alleges that the BLOCKBUSTER On Demand, DISH branded pay-TV and DISH Online services and our Hopper and Joey® set-top boxes infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 5,813,014, 5,832,499, 6,092,080, 6,353,831, 6,574,638, 6,199,060, 5,832,495, 6,549,911, 6,212,527 and 6,477,537. The patents relate to digital libraries, the management of multimedia assets, and the cataloging of multimedia data. Preservation Technologies is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could cause us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.
During 2007, Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. (“Katz”) filed a patent infringement action against our wholly-owned subsidiary, DISH Network L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The suit originally alleged infringement of 19 patents owned by Katz. The patents relate to interactive voice response, or IVR, technology. The case has been transferred and consolidated for pretrial purposes in the United States District Court for the Central District of California by order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Only four patents remain in the case against us, of which all are expired and two are subject to granted reexamination proceedings before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe any of the asserted patents, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could cause us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
Technology Development and Licensing L.L.C.
On January 22, 2009, Technology Development and Licensing L.L.C. (“TDL”) filed suit against DISH Network and EchoStar in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging infringement of United States Patent No. Re. 35,952, which relates to certain favorite channel features. TDL is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. In July 2009, the Court granted DISH Network’s motion to stay the case pending two reexamination petitions before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
We intend to vigorously defend this case. In the event that a court ultimately determines that we infringe the asserted patent, we may be subject to substantial damages, which may include treble damages, and/or an injunction that could cause us to materially modify certain features that we currently offer to consumers. We cannot predict with any degree of certainty the outcome of the suit or determine the extent of any potential liability or damages.
TQP Development, LLC
On April 4, 2012, TQP Development, LLC (“TQP Development”) filed suit against our wholly-owned subsidiary, DISH Network L.L.C., in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 5,412,730 titled “Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys.” TQP Development is an entity that seeks to license an acquired patent portfolio without itself practicing any of the claims recited therein. On August 9, 2013, all claims in the action were dismissed with prejudice.
Waste Disposal Inquiry
The California Attorney General and the Alameda County (California) District Attorney are investigating whether certain of our waste disposal policies, procedures and practices are in violation of the California Business and Professions Code and the California Health and Safety Code. We expect that these entities will seek injunctive and monetary relief. The investigation appears to be part of a broader effort to investigate waste handling and disposal processes of a number of industries. While we are unable to predict the outcome of this investigation, we do not believe that the outcome will have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Other
In addition to the above actions, we are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of business, including, among other things, disputes with programmers regarding fees. In our opinion, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to any of these actions is unlikely to materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity, though the outcomes could be material to our operating results for any particular period, depending, in part, upon the operating results for such period.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Financial Information for Subsidiary Guarantors
|
9 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|
| Financial Information for Subsidiary Guarantors | |
| Financial Information for Subsidiary Guarantors | 9. Financial Information for Subsidiary Guarantors
Our senior notes are fully, unconditionally and jointly and severally guaranteed by all of our subsidiaries other than minor subsidiaries and the stand-alone entity DISH DBS has no independent assets or operations. Therefore, supplemental financial information on a condensed consolidating basis of the guarantor subsidiaries is not required. There are no restrictions on our ability to obtain cash dividends or other distributions of funds from the guarantor subsidiaries, except those imposed by applicable law.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Financial information for subsidiary guarantors. No definition available.
|
|
Related Party Transactions
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Party Transactions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Party Transactions | 10. Related Party Transactions
Related Party Transactions with DISH Network
On October 1, 2012, we made a distribution to DOC of the assets and liabilities associated with our satellite broadband business with a fair value of $66 million. This distribution resulted in a reduction in our historical net assets of $9 million and a deemed dividend of $57 million.
On December 2, 2012, the board of directors of DISH Network declared a dividend of $1.00 per share on its outstanding Class A and Class B common stock, or $453 million in the aggregate. On December 27, 2012, we paid a dividend of $850 million to DOC to fund the payment of DISH Network’s dividend and other potential DISH Network cash needs.
Blockbuster. On April 26, 2011, our parent, DISH Network, completed the acquisition of most of the assets of Blockbuster, Inc. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we recorded $3 million and $11 million, respectively, of “Subscriber-related expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for Blockbuster services provided to our subscribers related to certain of our promotions. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded $6 million and $16 million for these Blockbuster services, respectively.
Advertising Sales. We provide advertising services to DISH Network’s broadband business. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, we received revenue associated with these services of $5 million and $11 million, respectively, in “Subscriber-related revenue” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not receive revenue associated with these services.
Blockbuster, Broadband, Wireless and Other Operations. We provide certain administrative support such as legal, information systems, marketing, human resources, accounting and finance services to DISH Network’s Blockbuster, Broadband, Wireless and other operations. In addition, we provide call center, installation and other services to DISH Network for its broadband business.
Related Party Transactions with EchoStar
Following the Spin-off, EchoStar has operated as a separate public company, and we have no continued ownership interest in EchoStar. However, a substantial majority of the voting power of the shares of both companies is owned beneficially by Charles W. Ergen, our Chairman, and by certain trusts established by Mr. Ergen for the benefit of his family.
EchoStar is our primary supplier of set-top boxes and digital broadcast operations and a key supplier of transponder capacity. Generally, the amounts we pay EchoStar for products and services are based on pricing equal to EchoStar’s cost plus a fixed margin (unless noted differently below), which will vary depending on the nature of the products and services provided.
In connection with and following the Spin-off, we and EchoStar have entered into certain agreements pursuant to which we obtain certain products, services and rights from EchoStar, EchoStar obtains certain products, services and rights from us, and we and EchoStar have indemnified each other against certain liabilities arising from our respective businesses. We also may enter into additional agreements with EchoStar in the future. The following is a summary of the terms of our principal agreements with EchoStar that may have an impact on our financial position and results of operations.
“Equipment sales, services and other revenue — EchoStar”
Remanufactured Receiver Agreement. We entered into a remanufactured receiver agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which EchoStar has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase remanufactured receivers and accessories from us at cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the equipment purchased. In November 2013, we and EchoStar extended this agreement until December 31, 2014. EchoStar may terminate the remanufactured receiver agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice to us. We may also terminate this agreement if certain entities acquire us.
Professional Services Agreement. Prior to 2010, in connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network entered into various agreements with EchoStar including the Transition Services Agreement, Satellite Procurement Agreement and Services Agreement, which all expired on January 1, 2010 and were replaced by a Professional Services Agreement. During 2009, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed that EchoStar shall continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to receive the following services from DISH Network, among others, certain of which were previously provided under the Transition Services Agreement: information technology, travel and event coordination, internal audit, legal, accounting and tax, benefits administration, program acquisition services and other support services. Additionally, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed that DISH Network shall continue to have the right, but not the obligation, to engage EchoStar to manage the process of procuring new satellite capacity for DISH Network (previously provided under the Satellite Procurement Agreement) and receive logistics, procurement and quality assurance services from EchoStar (previously provided under the Services Agreement) and other support services. The Professional Services Agreement automatically renewed on January 1, 2013 for an additional one-year period until January 1, 2014 and renews automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless terminated earlier by either party upon at least 60 days notice. However, either party may terminate the Professional Services Agreement in part with respect to any particular service it receives for any reason upon at least 30 days notice.
Management Services Agreement. In connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network entered into a Management Services Agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which DISH Network has made certain of its officers available to provide services (which were primarily legal and accounting services) to EchoStar. Specifically, Paul W. Orban remains employed by DISH Network, but also served as EchoStar’s Senior Vice President and Controller through April 2012. The Management Services Agreement automatically renewed on January 1, 2013 for an additional one-year period until January 1, 2014. Effective June 15, 2013, the Management Services Agreement was terminated by EchoStar. EchoStar made payments to DISH Network based upon an allocable portion of the personnel costs and expenses incurred by DISH Network with respect to any such officers (taking into account wages and fringe benefits). These allocations were based upon the estimated percentages of time spent by DISH Network’s executive officers performing services for EchoStar under the Management Services Agreement. EchoStar also reimbursed DISH Network for direct out-of-pocket costs incurred by DISH Network for management services provided to EchoStar. DISH Network and EchoStar evaluated all charges for reasonableness at least annually and made any adjustments to these charges as DISH Network and EchoStar mutually agreed upon.
Satellite Capacity Leased to EchoStar. Since the Spin-off, we have entered into certain satellite capacity agreements pursuant to which EchoStar leases certain satellite capacity on certain satellites owned by us. The fees for the services provided under these satellite capacity agreements depend, among other things, upon the orbital location of the applicable satellite and the length of the lease. The term of each lease is set forth below:
EchoStar I. During 2009, we entered into a satellite capacity agreement pursuant to which EchoStar leases certain satellite capacity from us on EchoStar I. We and EchoStar mutually agreed to terminate this satellite capacity agreement effective as of July 1, 2012.
EchoStar XV. During May 2013, we began leasing satellite capacity to EchoStar on EchoStar XV and relocated the satellite for testing at EchoStar’s Brazilian authorization at the 45 degree orbital location. Subject to certain conditions, (i) this lease terminates on February 1, 2014, (ii) EchoStar has certain rights to extend the service term of this lease for three years, and (iii) we have the right to terminate this lease prior to the date of expiration and have the satellite relocated from the 45 degree orbital location.
Real Estate Lease Agreements. Since the Spin-off, DISH Network has entered into lease agreements pursuant to which DISH Network leases certain real estate to EchoStar. The rent on a per square foot basis for each of the leases is comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic areas, and EchoStar is responsible for its portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises. The term of each lease is set forth below:
Varick Sublease Agreement. During 2008, DISH Network subleased certain space at 185 Varick Street, New York, New York to EchoStar for a period of approximately seven years.
El Paso Lease Agreement. During 2012, DISH Network leased certain space at 1285 Joe Battle Blvd. El Paso, Texas to EchoStar for a period ending on August 1, 2015, which also provides EchoStar with renewal options for four consecutive three-year terms.
American Fork Occupancy License Agreement. During 2013, DISH Network subleased certain space at 796 East Utah Valley Drive, American Fork, Utah to EchoStar for a period ending on July 31, 2017.
“Satellite and transmission expenses — EchoStar”
Broadcast Agreement. Effective January 1, 2012, we and EchoStar entered into a broadcast agreement (the “2012 Broadcast Agreement”) pursuant to which EchoStar provides broadcast services to us, including teleport services such as transmission and downlinking, channel origination services, and channel management services, for the period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016. The fees for services provided under the 2012 Broadcast Agreement are calculated at either: (a) EchoStar’s cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed dollar fee, which is subject to certain adjustments; or (b) EchoStar’s cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the services provided. We have the ability to terminate channel origination services and channel management services for any reason and without any liability upon at least 60 days notice to EchoStar. If we terminate the teleport services provided under the 2012 Broadcast Agreement for a reason other than EchoStar’s breach, we are generally obligated to reimburse EchoStar for any direct costs EchoStar incurs related to any such termination that it cannot reasonably mitigate.
Broadcast Agreement for Certain Sports Related Programming. During May 2010, we and EchoStar entered into a broadcast agreement pursuant to which EchoStar provides certain broadcast services to us in connection with our carriage of certain sports related programming. The term of this agreement is for ten years. If we terminate this agreement for a reason other than EchoStar’s breach, we are generally obligated to reimburse EchoStar for any direct costs EchoStar incurs related to any such termination that it cannot reasonably mitigate. The fees for the broadcast services provided under this agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and provide such services.
Satellite Capacity Leased from EchoStar. Since the Spin-off, we have entered into certain satellite capacity agreements pursuant to which we lease certain satellite capacity on certain satellites owned or leased by EchoStar. The fees for the services provided under these satellite capacity agreements depend, among other things, upon the orbital location of the applicable satellite and the length of the lease. The term of each lease is set forth below:
EchoStar VI, VIII and XII. The leases for EchoStar VI, VIII and XII generally terminate upon the earlier of: (i) the end of life or replacement of the satellite (unless we determine to renew on a year-to-year basis); (ii) the date the satellite fails; (iii) the date the transponders on which service is being provided fails; or (iv) a certain date, which depends upon, among other things, the estimated useful life of the satellite, whether the replacement satellite fails at launch or in orbit prior to being placed into service and the exercise of certain renewal options. We generally have the option to renew each lease on a year-to-year basis through the end of the respective satellite’s life. There can be no assurance that any options to renew such agreements will be exercised. Beginning in the first quarter 2013, the leases for the EchoStar VI and VIII satellites expired in accordance with their terms and we no longer leased capacity from EchoStar on EchoStar VI and VIII. During May 2013, we began leasing capacity from EchoStar on EchoStar VIII as an in-orbit spare. Subject to certain conditions, this lease terminates on February 1, 2014.
EchoStar IX. We lease certain satellite capacity from EchoStar on EchoStar IX. Subject to availability, we generally have the right to continue to lease satellite capacity from EchoStar on EchoStar IX on a month-to-month basis.
EchoStar XVI. During December 2009, we entered into a transponder service agreement with EchoStar to lease all of the capacity on EchoStar XVI, a DBS satellite, after its service commencement date. EchoStar XVI was launched during November 2012 to replace EchoStar XV at the 61.5 degree orbital location and is currently in service. Under the original transponder service agreement, the initial term generally expired upon the earlier of: (i) the end-of-life or replacement of the satellite; (ii) the date the satellite failed; (iii) the date the transponder(s) on which service was being provided under the agreement failed; or (iv) ten years following the actual service commencement date. Prior to expiration of the initial term, we also had the option to renew on a year-to-year basis through the end-of-life of the satellite. Effective December 21, 2012, we and EchoStar amended the transponder service agreement to, among other things, change the initial term to generally expire upon the earlier of: (i) the end-of-life or replacement of the satellite; (ii) the date the satellite fails; (iii) the date the transponder(s) on which service is being provided under the agreement fails; or (iv) four years following the actual service commencement date. Prior to expiration of the initial term, we have the option to renew for an additional six-year period. Prior to expiration of the initial term, EchoStar also has the right, upon certain conditions, to renew for an additional six-year period. If either we or EchoStar exercise our respective six-year renewal options, then we have the option to renew for an additional five-year period prior to expiration of the then-current term. There can be no assurance that any options to renew this agreement will be exercised.
Nimiq 5 Agreement. During 2009, EchoStar entered into a fifteen-year satellite service agreement with Telesat Canada (“Telesat”) to receive service on all 32 DBS transponders on the Nimiq 5 satellite at the 72.7 degree orbital location (the “Telesat Transponder Agreement”). During 2009, EchoStar also entered into a satellite service agreement (the “DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement”) with us, pursuant to which we currently receive service from EchoStar on all 32 of the DBS transponders covered by the Telesat Transponder Agreement. DISH Network has also guaranteed certain obligations of EchoStar under the Telesat Transponder Agreement. See discussion under “Guarantees” in Note 8.
Under the terms of the DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement, we make certain monthly payments to EchoStar that commenced in September 2009 when the Nimiq 5 satellite was placed into service and continue through the service term. Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement, the service term will expire ten years following the date it was placed into service. Upon expiration of the initial term we have the option to renew the DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end of life of the Nimiq 5 satellite. Upon in-orbit failure or end of life of the Nimiq 5 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, we have certain rights to receive service from EchoStar on a replacement satellite. There can be no assurance that any options to renew the DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement will be exercised or that we will exercise our option to receive service on a replacement satellite.
QuetzSat-1 Lease Agreement. During 2008, EchoStar entered into a ten-year satellite service agreement with SES Latin America S.A. (“SES”), which provides, among other things, for the provision by SES to EchoStar of service on 32 DBS transponders on the QuetzSat-1 satellite. During 2008, EchoStar also entered into a transponder service agreement (“QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement”) with us pursuant to which we receive service from EchoStar on 24 of the DBS transponders. QuetzSat-1 was launched on September 29, 2011 and was placed into service during the fourth quarter 2011 at the 67.1 degree orbital location while we and EchoStar explored alternative uses for the QuetzSat-1 satellite. In the interim, EchoStar provided us with alternate capacity at the 77 degree orbital location. During the third quarter 2012, we and EchoStar entered into an agreement pursuant to which we sublease back to EchoStar five of the 24 DBS transponders on the QuetzSat-1 satellite. Rental income generated from this sublease is recorded as revenue within “Equipment sales, services and other revenue — EchoStar” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). During January 2013, QuetzSat-1 was moved to the 77 degree orbital location and we commenced commercial operations at that location in February 2013.
Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement, the initial service term will expire in November 2021. Upon expiration of the initial term, we have the option to renew the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement on a year-to-year basis through the end of life of the QuetzSat-1 satellite. Upon an in-orbit failure or end of life of the QuetzSat-1 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, we have certain rights to receive service from EchoStar on a replacement satellite. There can be no assurance that any options to renew the QuetzSat-1 Transponder Agreement will be exercised or that we will exercise our option to receive service on a replacement satellite.
103 Degree Orbital Location/SES-3. During May 2012, EchoStar entered into a spectrum development agreement (the “103 Spectrum Development Agreement”) with Ciel Satellite Holdings Inc. (“Ciel”) to develop certain spectrum rights at the 103 degree orbital location (the “103 Spectrum Rights”). During June 2013, we and EchoStar entered into a spectrum development agreement (the “DISH 103 Spectrum Development Agreement”) pursuant to which we may use and develop the 103 Spectrum Rights. During the third quarter 2013, we made a $23 million payment to EchoStar in exchange for these rights. In accordance with accounting principles that apply to transfers of assets between companies under common control, we recorded EchoStar’s net book value of this asset of $20 million in “Other noncurrent assets, net” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and recorded the amount in excess of EchoStar’s net book value of $3 million as a capital distribution. Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH 103 Spectrum Development Agreement, the term generally will continue for the duration of the 103 Spectrum Rights.
In connection with the 103 Spectrum Development Agreement, during May 2012, EchoStar also entered into a ten-year service agreement with Ciel pursuant to which EchoStar leases certain satellite capacity from Ciel on the SES-3 satellite at the 103 degree orbital location (the “103 Service Agreement”). During June 2013, we and EchoStar entered into an agreement pursuant to which we lease certain satellite capacity from EchoStar on the SES-3 satellite (the “DISH 103 Service Agreement”). Under the terms of the DISH 103 Service Agreement, we make certain monthly payments to EchoStar through the service term. Unless earlier terminated under the terms and conditions of the DISH 103 Service Agreement, the initial service term will expire on the earlier of: (i) the date the SES-3 satellite fails; (ii) the date the transponder(s) on which service was being provided under the agreement fails; or (iii) ten years following the actual service commencement date. Upon in-orbit failure or end of life of the SES-3 satellite, and in certain other circumstances, we have certain rights to receive service from EchoStar on a replacement satellite. There can be no assurance that we will exercise our option to receive service on a replacement satellite.
TT&C Agreement. Effective January 1, 2012, we entered into a telemetry, tracking and control (“TT&C”) agreement pursuant to which we receive TT&C services from EchoStar for a period ending on December 31, 2016 (the “2012 TT&C Agreement”). The fees for services provided under the 2012 TT&C Agreement are calculated at either: (i) a fixed fee; or (ii) cost plus a fixed margin, which will vary depending on the nature of the services provided. We are able to terminate the 2012 TT&C Agreement for any reason upon 60 days notice.
“General and administrative expenses — EchoStar”
Product Support Agreement. In connection with the Spin-off, we entered into a product support agreement pursuant to which we have the right, but not the obligation, to receive product support from EchoStar (including certain engineering and technical support services) for all set-top boxes and related accessories that EchoStar has previously sold and in the future may sell to us. The fees for the services provided under the product support agreement are calculated at cost plus a fixed margin, which varies depending on the nature of the services provided. The term of the product support agreement is the economic life of such receivers and related accessories, unless terminated earlier. We may terminate the product support agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice. In the event of an early termination of this agreement, we are entitled to a refund of any unearned fees paid to EchoStar for the services.
Real Estate Lease Agreements. We have entered into lease agreements pursuant to which we lease certain real estate from EchoStar. The rent on a per square foot basis for each of the leases is comparable to per square foot rental rates of similar commercial property in the same geographic area, and EchoStar is responsible for its portion of the taxes, insurance, utilities and maintenance of the premises. The term of each of the leases is set forth below:
· Inverness Lease Agreement. The lease for certain space at 90 Inverness Circle East in Englewood, Colorado is for a period ending on December 31, 2016. This agreement can be terminated by either party upon six months prior notice.
· Meridian Lease Agreement. The lease for all of 9601 S. Meridian Blvd. in Englewood, Colorado is for a period ending on December 31, 2016.
· Santa Fe Lease Agreement. The lease for all of 5701 S. Santa Fe Dr. in Littleton, Colorado is for a period ending on December 31, 2016 with a renewal option for one additional year.
· EchoStar Data Networks Sublease Agreement. The sublease for certain space at 211 Perimeter Center in Atlanta, Georgia is for a period ending on October 31, 2016.
· Gilbert Lease Agreement. The lease for certain space at 801 N. DISH Dr. in Gilbert, Arizona is a month-to-month lease and can be terminated by either party upon 30 days prior notice.
· Cheyenne Lease Agreement. The lease for certain space at 530 EchoStar Drive in Cheyenne, Wyoming is for a period ending on December 31, 2031.
DISHOnline.com Services Agreement. Effective January 1, 2010, we entered into a two-year agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which we receive certain services associated with an online video portal. The fees for the services provided under this services agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and operate such services. We have the option to renew this agreement for three successive one year terms and the agreement may be terminated for any reason upon at least 120 days notice to EchoStar. In November 2013, we exercised our right to renew this agreement for a one-year period ending on December 31, 2014.
DISH Remote Access Services Agreement. Effective February 23, 2010, we entered into an agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which we receive, among other things, certain remote DVR management services. The fees for the services provided under this services agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and operate such services. This agreement has a term of five years with automatic renewal for successive one year terms. This agreement may be terminated for any reason upon at least 120 days notice to EchoStar.
SlingService Services Agreement. Effective February 23, 2010, we entered into an agreement with EchoStar pursuant to which we receive certain services related to placeshifting. The fees for the services provided under this services agreement depend, among other things, upon the cost to develop and operate such services. This agreement has a term of five years with automatic renewal for successive one year terms. This agreement may be terminated for any reason upon at least 120 days notice to EchoStar.
Application Development Agreement. During the fourth quarter 2012, we and EchoStar entered into a set-top box application development agreement (the “Application Development Agreement”) pursuant to which EchoStar provides us with certain services relating to the development of web-based applications for set-top boxes for a period ending on February 1, 2015. The Application Development Agreement renews automatically for successive one-year periods thereafter, unless terminated earlier by us or EchoStar at any time upon at least 90 days notice. The fees for services provided under the Application Development Agreement are calculated at EchoStar’s cost of providing the relevant service plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the services provided.
XiP Encryption Agreement. During the third quarter 2012, we entered into an encryption agreement with EchoStar for our whole-home HD DVR line of set-top boxes (the “XiP Encryption Agreement”) pursuant to which EchoStar provides certain security measures on our whole-home HD DVR line of set-top boxes to encrypt the content delivered to the set-top box via a smart card and secure the content between set-top boxes. The term of the XiP Encryption Agreement is for a period until December 31, 2014. Under the XiP Encryption Agreement, we have the option, but not the obligation, to extend the XiP Encryption Agreement for one additional year upon 180 days notice prior to the end of the term. We and EchoStar each have the right to terminate the XiP Encryption Agreement for any reason upon at least 30 days notice and 180 days notice, respectively. The fees for the services provided under the XiP Encryption Agreement are calculated on a monthly basis based on the number of receivers utilizing such security measures each month.
Other Agreements — EchoStar
Receiver Agreement. EchoStar is currently our sole supplier of set-top box receivers. Effective January 1, 2012, we and EchoStar entered into a receiver agreement (the “2012 Receiver Agreement”) pursuant to which we have the right, but not the obligation, to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories, and other equipment from EchoStar for the period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014. We have an option, but not the obligation, to extend the 2012 Receiver Agreement for one additional year upon 180 days notice prior to the end of the term. The 2012 Receiver Agreement allows us to purchase digital set-top boxes, related accessories and other equipment from EchoStar either: (i) at a cost (decreasing as EchoStar reduces costs and increasing as costs increase) plus a dollar mark-up which will depend upon the cost of the product subject to a collar on EchoStar’s mark-up; or (ii) at cost plus a fixed margin, which will depend on the nature of the equipment purchased. Under the 2012 Receiver Agreement, EchoStar’s margins will be increased if they are able to reduce the costs of their digital set-top boxes and their margins will be reduced if these costs increase. EchoStar provides us with standard manufacturer warranties for the goods sold under the 2012 Receiver Agreement. Additionally, the 2012 Receiver Agreement includes an indemnification provision, whereby the parties indemnify each other for certain intellectual property matters. We are able to terminate the 2012 Receiver Agreement for any reason upon at least 60 days notice to EchoStar. EchoStar is able to terminate the 2012 Receiver Agreement if certain entities acquire us.
For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we purchased set-top boxes and other equipment from EchoStar of $341 million and $247 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we purchased set-top boxes and other equipment from EchoStar of $947 million and $738 million, respectively. These amounts are initially included in “Inventory” and are subsequently capitalized as “Property and equipment, net” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets or expensed as “Subscriber acquisition costs” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) when the equipment is deployed.
Tax Sharing Agreement. In connection with the Spin-off, DISH Network entered into a tax sharing agreement with EchoStar which governs our respective rights, responsibilities and obligations after the Spin-off with respect to taxes for the periods ending on or before the Spin-off. Generally, all pre-Spin-off taxes, including any taxes that are incurred as a result of restructuring activities undertaken to implement the Spin-off, are borne by DISH Network, and DISH Network will indemnify EchoStar for such taxes. However, DISH Network is not liable for and will not indemnify EchoStar for any taxes that are incurred as a result of the Spin-off or certain related transactions failing to qualify as tax-free distributions pursuant to any provision of Section 355 or Section 361 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) because of: (i) a direct or indirect acquisition of any of EchoStar’s stock, stock options or assets; (ii) any action that EchoStar takes or fails to take; or (iii) any action that EchoStar takes that is inconsistent with the information and representations furnished to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in connection with the request for the private letter ruling, or to counsel in connection with any opinion being delivered by counsel with respect to the Spin-off or certain related transactions. In such case, EchoStar is solely liable for, and will indemnify DISH Network for, any resulting taxes, as well as any losses, claims and expenses. The tax sharing agreement will only terminate after the later of the full period of all applicable statutes of limitations, including extensions, or once all rights and obligations are fully effectuated or performed.
In light of the tax sharing agreement, among other things, and in connection with DISH Network’s consolidated federal income tax returns for certain tax years prior to and for the year of the Spin-off, during the third quarter 2013, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed upon a supplemental allocation of the tax benefits arising from certain tax items resolved in the course of the IRS’ examination of these consolidated tax returns. As a result, DISH Network agreed to pay EchoStar $83 million of the tax benefit DISH Network received or will receive. Any payment to EchoStar, including accrued interest, will be made at such time as EchoStar would have otherwise been able to realize such tax benefit. In addition, during the third quarter 2013, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed upon a tax sharing arrangement for filing certain combined state income tax returns and a method of allocating the respective tax liabilities between DISH Network and EchoStar for such combined returns, through the taxable period ending on December 31, 2017.
RUS Implementation Agreement. In September 2010, DISH Broadband L.L.C. (“DISH Broadband”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, was selected by the Rural Utilities Service (“RUS”) of the United States Department of Agriculture to receive up to approximately $14 million in broadband stimulus grant funds (the “Grant Funds”). Effective November 2011, DISH Broadband and Hughes Network Systems, LLC (“HNS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hughes Communications, Inc. (“Hughes”), entered into a RUS Implementation Agreement (the “RUS Agreement”) pursuant to which HNS provides certain portions of the equipment and broadband service used to implement our RUS program. The initial term of the RUS Agreement shall continue until the earlier of: (i) September 24, 2013; or (ii) the date that the Grant Funds have been exhausted. In addition, DISH Broadband may terminate the RUS Agreement for convenience upon 45 days prior written notice to HNS. The RUS Agreement expired during June 2013 when the Grant Funds were exhausted. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, we expensed $4 million under this agreement which is included in “Cost of sales — equipment, services and other” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we expensed $3 million and $6 million, respectively, under this agreement.
TiVo. On April 29, 2011, DISH Network and EchoStar entered into a settlement agreement with TiVo, Inc. (“TiVo”). The settlement resolved all pending litigation between DISH Network and EchoStar, on the one hand, and TiVo, on the other hand, including litigation relating to alleged patent infringement involving certain DISH digital video recorders, or DVRs.
Under the settlement agreement, all pending litigation was dismissed with prejudice and all injunctions that permanently restrain, enjoin or compel any action by DISH Network or EchoStar were dissolved. DISH Network and EchoStar are jointly responsible for making payments to TiVo in the aggregate amount of $500 million, including an initial payment of $300 million and the remaining $200 million in six equal annual installments between 2012 and 2017. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the agreements entered into in connection with the Spin-off of EchoStar from DISH Network, DISH Network made the initial payment to TiVo in May 2011, except for the contribution from EchoStar totaling approximately $10 million, representing an allocation of liability relating to EchoStar’s sales of DVR-enabled receivers to an international customer. Future payments will be allocated between DISH Network and EchoStar based on historical sales of certain licensed products, with DISH Network being responsible for 95% of each annual payment.
Patent Cross-License Agreements. During December 2011, DISH Network and EchoStar entered into separate patent cross-license agreements with the same third party whereby: (i) EchoStar and such third party licensed their respective patents to each other subject to certain conditions; and (ii) DISH Network and such third party licensed their respective patents to each other subject to certain conditions (each, a “Cross-License Agreement”). Each Cross License Agreement covers patents acquired by the respective party prior to January 1, 2017 and aggregate payments under both Cross-License Agreements total less than $10 million. Each Cross License Agreement also contains an option to extend each Cross-License Agreement to include patents acquired by the respective party prior to January 1, 2022. If both options are exercised, the aggregate additional payments to such third party would total less than $3 million. However, DISH Network and EchoStar may elect to extend their respective Cross-License Agreement independently of each other. Since the aggregate payments under both Cross-License Agreements were based on the combined annual revenues of DISH Network and EchoStar, DISH Network and EchoStar agreed to allocate their respective payments to such third party based on their respective percentage of combined total revenue.
Voom Settlement Agreement. On October 21, 2012, we entered into the Voom Settlement Agreement with Voom and Cablevision, and for certain limited purposes, MSG Holdings, L.P., The Madison Square Garden Company and EchoStar. The Voom Settlement Agreement resolved the litigation between the parties relating to the Voom programming services. EchoStar was a party to the Voom Settlement Agreement solely for the purposes of executing a mutual release of claims with Voom, Cablevision, MSG Holdings, L.P. and The Madison Square Garden Company relating to the Voom programming services.
Other Agreements
In November 2009, Mr. Roger Lynch became employed by both DISH Network and EchoStar as Executive Vice President. Mr. Lynch is responsible for the development and implementation of advanced technologies that are of potential utility and importance to both DISH Network and EchoStar. Mr. Lynch’s compensation consists of cash and equity compensation and is borne by both EchoStar and DISH Network.
Related Party Transactions with NagraStar L.L.C.
NagraStar is a joint venture between EchoStar and Nagra USA, Inc. that is our provider of encryption and related security systems intended to assure that only authorized customers have access to our programming.
The table below summarizes our transactions with NagraStar.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The entire disclosure for related party transactions. Examples of related party transactions include transactions between (a) a parent company and its subsidiary; (b) subsidiaries of a common parent; (c) and entity and its principal owners; and (d) affiliates. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Subsequent Events
|
9 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|
| Subsequent Events | |
| Subsequent Events | 11. Subsequent Events
7% Senior Notes due 2013
On October 1, 2013, we redeemed the remaining $451 million principal balance of our 7% Senior Notes due 2013.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The entire disclosure for significant events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date the financial statements were issued or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. Examples include: the sale of a capital stock issue, purchase of a business, settlement of litigation, catastrophic loss, significant foreign exchange rate changes, loans to insiders or affiliates, and transactions not in the ordinary course of business. No definition available.
|
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
|
9 Months Ended |
|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|
| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | |
| Basis of Presentation | Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X for interim financial information. Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and notes required for complete financial statements prepared under GAAP. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Our results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (“2012 10-K”). Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
|
| Principles of Consolidation | Principles of Consolidation
We consolidate all majority owned subsidiaries, investments in entities in which we have controlling influence and variable interest entities where we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary. Non-majority owned investments are accounted for using the equity method when we have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of the investee. When we do not have the ability to significantly influence the operating decisions of an investee, the cost method is used. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
|
| Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense for each reporting period. Estimates are used in accounting for, among other things, allowances for doubtful accounts, self-insurance obligations, deferred taxes and related valuation allowances, uncertain tax positions, loss contingencies, fair value of financial instruments, fair value of options granted under our stock-based compensation plans, fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, fair value of multi-element arrangements, capital leases, asset impairments, estimates of future cash flows used to evaluate impairments, useful lives of property, equipment and intangible assets, retailer incentives, programming expenses, subscriber lives and royalty obligations. Weak economic conditions have increased the inherent uncertainty in the estimates and assumptions indicated above. Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected prospectively in the period they occur.
|
| Fair Value Measurements | Fair Value Measurements
We determine fair value based on the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Market or observable inputs are the preferred source of values, followed by unobservable inputs or assumptions based on hypothetical transactions in the absence of market inputs. We apply the following hierarchy in determining fair value:
· Level 1, defined as observable inputs being quoted prices in active markets for identical assets, including U.S. treasury notes;
· Level 2, defined as observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
· Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, consistent with reasonably available assumptions made by other participants therefore requiring assumptions based on the best information available.
As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, marketable investment securities, trade accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts), and current liabilities (excluding the “Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations”) is equal to or approximates fair value due to their short-term nature or proximity to current market rates. See Note 3 for the fair value of our marketable investment securities.
Fair values for our publicly traded debt securities are based on quoted market prices, when available. The fair values of private debt are estimated based on an analysis in which we evaluate market conditions, related securities, various public and private offerings, and other publicly available information. In performing this analysis, we make various assumptions regarding, among other things, credit spreads, and the impact of these factors on the value of the debt securities. See Note 6 for the fair value of our long-term debt.
|
| Advertising Costs | Advertising Costs
Our advertising costs associated with acquiring new Pay-TV subscribers are expensed as incurred. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we recorded advertising costs of $111 million and $123 million, respectively, and during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we recorded advertising costs of $344 million and $330 million, respectively. Advertising costs are included in “Other subscriber acquisition costs” and “General and administrative expenses” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
|
| Deferred Cost of Sales | Deferred Cost of Sales
On May 22, 2013, we launched a promotion whereby qualifying new Pay-TV subscribers may choose either an Apple® iPad® 2 or programming credits when they, among other things, commit to a two-year contract. The costs of the iPad 2 are recorded as short-term or long-term deferred cost of sales expense within “Other current assets” and “Other noncurrent assets, net,” respectively, on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the related contract term to “Cost of sales — equipment, services and other” on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).
|
| New Accounting Pronouncements | New Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit when a Net Operating Loss Carryforward or Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. ASU 2013-11 requires that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions. This standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2013-11 to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Disclosure of accounting policy for advertising costs. For those costs that cannot be capitalized, discloses whether such costs are expensed as incurred or the first period in which the advertising takes place. For direct response advertising costs that are capitalized, describes those assets and the accounting policy used, including a description of the qualifying activity, the types of costs capitalized and the related amortization period. An entity also may disclose its accounting policy for cooperative advertising arrangements. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Disclosure of accounting policy for basis of accounting, or basis of presentation, used to prepare the financial statements (for example, US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, Other Comprehensive Basis of Accounting, IFRS). No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Disclosure of accounting policy regarding (1) the principles it follows in consolidating or combining the separate financial statements, including the principles followed in determining the inclusion or exclusion of subsidiaries or other entities in the consolidated or combined financial statements and (2) its treatment of interests (for example, common stock, a partnership interest or other means of exerting influence) in other entities, for example consolidation or use of the equity or cost methods of accounting. The accounting policy may also address the accounting treatment for intercompany accounts and transactions, noncontrolling interest, and the income statement treatment in consolidation for issuances of stock by a subsidiary. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Disclosure of accounting policy for deferral and amortization of significant deferred charges. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Disclosure of accounting policy for determining the fair value of financial instruments. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Disclosure of accounting policy pertaining to new accounting pronouncements that may impact the entity's financial reporting. Includes, but is not limited to, quantification of the expected or actual impact. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Disclosure of accounting policy for the use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Marketable Investment Securities and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents (Tables)
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Marketable Investment Securities and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents |
(1) Restricted marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents are included in “Restricted cash and marketable investment securities” on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of unrealized gain (loss) on marketable investment securities |
(1) In connection with certain commercial arrangements that we entered into during the third quarter 2012, among other things, we received shares of common stock from a single issuer for no cash consideration.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of available-for-sale securities in continuous unrealized loss position by length of time and their fair value |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of fair value measurements |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
A table of investments, shown as a text block. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Tabular disclosure of assets, including [financial] instruments measured at fair value that are classified in stockholders' equity, if any, by class that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The disclosures contemplated herein include the fair value measurements at the reporting date by the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall, segregating fair value measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1), significant other observable inputs (Level 2), and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
For all investments in an unrealized loss position, including those for which other-than-temporary impairments have not been recognized in earnings (including investments for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in other comprehensive income), a tabular disclosure of the aggregate related fair value of investments with unrealized losses and the aggregate amount of unrealized losses (that is, the amount by which amortized cost basis exceeds fair value). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Tabular disclosure of unrealized gains and losses on investments. No definition available.
|
|
Inventory (Tables)
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Inventory | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of inventory |
(1) The increase in “Total inventory” as of September 30, 2013 primarily related to an increase in Hopper® set-top boxes and broadband equipment.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Tabular disclosure of the carrying amount as of the balance sheet date of merchandise, goods, commodities, or supplies held for future sale or to be used in manufacturing, servicing or production process. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Property and Equipment (Tables)
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Property and Equipment | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of depreciation and amortization expense |
(1) During the second quarter 2012, we recorded $68 million of “Depreciation and amortization” expense related to the termination of the license by the FCC for use the 148 degree orbital location.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Schedule of depreciation and amortization expense. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Long-Term Debt (Tables)
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Long-Term Debt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of carrying and fair values of the entity's debt facilities |
(1) During the three months ended September 30, 2013, we repurchased $49 million of our 7% Senior Notes due 2013 in open market transactions. On October 1, 2013, we redeemed the remaining $451 million principal balance of our 7% Senior Notes due 2013. (2) Disclosure regarding fair value of capital leases is not required.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Tabular disclosure of long-debt instruments or arrangements, including identification, terms, features, collateral requirements and other information necessary to a fair presentation. These are debt arrangements that originally required repayment more than twelve months after issuance or greater than the normal operating cycle of the entity, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation (Tables)
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-Based Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of stock awards outstanding |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of stock option activity associated with employees |
(1) The beginning of period weighted-average exercise price of $18.99 does not reflect the 2012 Stock Option Adjustment, which occurred subsequent to December 31, 2012. (2) These stock options are included in the caption “Total options outstanding, end of period.” See discussion of the 2005 LTIP, 2013 LTIP and Other Employee Performance Awards below.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of realized tax benefits from stock awards exercised |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of aggregate intrinsic value of stock options associated with employees |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of restricted stock unit activity associated with employees |
(1) These Restricted Performance Units are included in the caption “Total restricted stock units outstanding, end of period.” See discussion of the 2005 LTIP, 2013 LTIP and Other Employee Performance Awards below.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of awards outstanding pursuant to performance-based stock incentive plans |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of allocated non-cash, stock-based compensation expense for all employees |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of assumptions of Black-Scholes option valuation model |
(1) During the three months ended September 30, 2013, there were no stock options granted. (2) During the three months ended September 30, 2012, all stock options granted had the same vesting period.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LTIP 2005
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-Based Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of unrecognized non-cash, stock-based compensation expense |
(1) Represents the amount of this award that has met the foregoing vesting schedule and would therefore vest upon achievement of the performance condition.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
LTIP 2008, LTIP 2013 and Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stock-Based Compensation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of unrecognized non-cash, stock-based compensation expense |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of non-cash, stock-based compensation expense recognized |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Schedule of aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and exercisable. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Schedule of non-cash stock-based compensation expense. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Schedule of nonvested performance based plans. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Schedule of share based compensation realized tax benefits from stock awards exercised. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Tabular disclosure of the number outstanding stock awards. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Schedule of unrecognized non-cash stock-based compensation. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Tabular disclosure of the allocation of equity-based compensation costs to a given line item on the balance sheet and income statement for the period. This may include the reporting line for the costs and the amount capitalized and expensed. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Tabular disclosure of the number and weighted-average grant date fair value for restricted stock units that were outstanding at the beginning and end of the year, and the number of restricted stock units that were granted, vested, or forfeited during the year. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Tabular disclosure of the number and weighted-average exercise prices (or conversion ratios) for share options (or share units) that were outstanding at the beginning and end of the year, vested and expected to vest, exercisable or convertible at the end of the year, and the number of share options or share units that were granted, exercised or converted, forfeited, and expired during the year. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Tabular disclosure of the significant assumptions used during the year to estimate the fair value of stock options, including, but not limited to: (a) expected term of share options and similar instruments, (b) expected volatility of the entity's shares, (c) expected dividends, (d) risk-free rate(s), and (e) discount for post-vesting restrictions. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Related Party Transactions (Tables)
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related Party Transactions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Schedule of transactions with NagraStar |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Tabular disclosure of related party transactions. Examples of related party transactions include, but are not limited to, transactions between (a) a parent company and its subsidiary; (b) subsidiaries of a common parent; (c) and entity and its principal owners and (d) affiliates. No definition available.
|
|
Organization and Business Activities (Details)
|
Sep. 30, 2013
subscriber
|
|---|---|
| Organization and Business Activities | |
| Number of subscribers | 14,049,000 |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of subscribers. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Details) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
|
| Advertising Costs | ||||
| Advertising costs | $ 111 | $ 123 | $ 344 | $ 330 |
| Deferred Cost of Sales | ||||
| Customer contract commitment period associated with deferred cost of sales promotional items | 2 years | |||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Deferred Cost Of Sales Customer Contract Commitment Term. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount charged to advertising expense for the period, which are expenses incurred with the objective of increasing revenue for a specified brand, product or product line. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Marketable Investment Securities and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents (Details) (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mar. 31, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Current marketable investment securities - VRDNs
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Current marketable investment securities - VRDNs
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Current marketable investment securities - other
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Current marketable investment securities - other
|
|
| Marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents: | |||||||
| Current marketable investment securities | $ 3,981,481,000 | $ 2,269,670,000 | $ 143,665,000 | $ 124,007,000 | $ 3,837,816,000 | $ 2,145,663,000 | |
| Restricted marketable investment securities | 59,670,000 | 49,044,000 | |||||
| Total marketable investment securities | 4,041,151,000 | 2,318,714,000 | |||||
| Restricted cash and cash equivalents | 23,110,000 | 72,617,000 | |||||
| Total marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents | 4,064,261,000 | 2,391,331,000 | |||||
| Settlement period | 5 days | ||||||
| Restricted cash related to litigation released during the period | $ 42,000,000 |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the amount of marketable investment securities and restricted cash and cash equivalents. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Settlement period of security. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of investment in debt and equity securities categorized neither as trading securities nor held-to-maturity securities and intended be sold or mature one year or operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The net cash inflow or outflow for the increase (decrease) associated with funds that are not available for withdrawal or use (such as funds held in escrow) and are associated with underlying transactions that are classified as investing activities. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Total debt and equity financial instruments including: (1) securities held-to-maturity, (2) trading securities, and (3) securities available-for-sale. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Total debt and equity financial instruments including: (1) securities held-to-maturity, (2) trading securities, and (3) securities available-for-sale which are intended to be held for greater than one year or the normal operating cycle, whichever is longer and that are pledged to one or more secured parties who have the right to buy, sell, or re-pledge the collateral. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalent items which are restricted as to withdrawal or usage. Restrictions may include legally restricted deposits held as compensating balances against borrowing arrangements, contracts entered into with others, or entity statements of intention with regard to particular deposits; however, time deposits and short-term certificates of deposit are not generally included in legally restricted deposits. Excludes compensating balance arrangements that are not agreements which legally restrict the use of cash amounts shown on the balance sheet. This element is for unclassified presentations; for classified presentations there is a separate and distinct element. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the accumulated appreciation or loss, before tax, in value of the total of available-for-sale securities at the end of an accounting period. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the amount of cash consideration given for receiving shares of common stock from a single issuer. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of accumulated unrealized gain before deducting unrealized loss on investments in available-for-sale securities impacting investments. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Net amount of the difference between the fair value and cost of investments in available-for-sale securities. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of accumulated unrealized loss before deducting unrealized gain on investments in available-for-sale securities impacting investments. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Accumulated appreciation or loss, net of tax, in value of the total of available-for-sale securities at the end of an accounting period. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of investment in debt and equity securities categorized neither as held-to-maturity nor trading. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of investment in debt and equity securities categorized neither as trading securities nor held-to-maturity securities and intended be sold or mature one year or operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of available-for-sale debt securities at fair value maturing in the second fiscal year through the fifth fiscal year following the latest fiscal year. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of investments in debt securities classified as available-for-sale, expected to be converted to cash, sold or exchanged within one year or the normal operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of equity securities categorized neither as held-to-maturity nor as trading. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Total debt and equity financial instruments including: (1) securities held-to-maturity, (2) trading securities, and (3) securities available-for-sale. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Marketable Investment Securities and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents (Details 3) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
|---|---|---|
| Fair value of marketable investment securities in a loss position | ||
| Total | $ 1,682,719 | $ 753,784 |
| Unrealized loss on marketable investment securities in a loss position | ||
| Total | (1,454) | (1,144) |
|
Debt Securities
|
||
| Fair value of marketable investment securities in a loss position | ||
| Less than 12 Months | 1,605,223 | 724,739 |
| 12 Months or More | 77,496 | 29,045 |
| Unrealized loss on marketable investment securities in a loss position | ||
| Less than 12 months | (903) | (865) |
| 12 months or More | $ (551) | $ (279) |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of accumulated unrealized loss on securities classified as available-for-sale securities that have been in a loss position for twelve months or longer impacting investments. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of accumulated unrealized loss on securities classified as available-for-sale securities, impacting investments. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of accumulated unrealized loss on securities classified as available-for-sale securities that have been in a loss position for less than twelve months impacting investments. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
This item represents the aggregate fair value of investments in debt and equity securities in an unrealized loss position which are categorized neither as held-to-maturity nor trading securities. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
This item represents the aggregate fair value of investments in debt and equity securities categorized neither as held-to-maturity nor trading securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
This item represents the aggregate fair value of investments in debt and equity securities categorized neither as held-to-maturity nor trading securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Marketable Investment Securities and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents (Details 4) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
|---|---|---|
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Debt securities | $ 3,981,481 | $ 2,269,670 |
| Total marketable investment securities | 4,041,151 | 2,318,714 |
|
VRDNs
|
||
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Debt securities | 143,665 | 124,007 |
|
Other (including restricted)
|
||
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Debt security | 3,874,652 | 2,181,064 |
|
Equity Securities
|
||
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Equity securities | 22,834 | 13,643 |
|
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Total
|
||
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Cash equivalents (including restricted) | 4,077,784 | 3,014,946 |
| Total marketable investment securities | 4,041,151 | 2,318,714 |
|
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Total | VRDNs
|
||
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Debt securities | 143,665 | 124,007 |
|
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Total | Other (including restricted)
|
||
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Debt security | 3,874,652 | 2,181,064 |
|
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Total | Equity Securities
|
||
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Equity securities | 22,834 | 13,643 |
|
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 1
|
||
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Cash equivalents (including restricted) | 277,438 | 59,386 |
| Total marketable investment securities | 22,834 | 13,643 |
|
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 1 | Equity Securities
|
||
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Equity securities | 22,834 | 13,643 |
|
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 2
|
||
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Cash equivalents (including restricted) | 3,800,346 | 2,955,560 |
| Total marketable investment securities | 4,018,317 | 2,305,071 |
|
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 2 | VRDNs
|
||
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Debt securities | 143,665 | 124,007 |
|
Fair value measurements on recurring basis | Level 2 | Other (including restricted)
|
||
| Fair value of marketable securities | ||
| Debt security | $ 3,874,652 | $ 2,181,064 |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of investment in debt and equity securities categorized neither as held-to-maturity nor trading. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of investment in debt and equity securities categorized neither as trading securities nor held-to-maturity securities and intended be sold or mature one year or operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of equity securities categorized neither as held-to-maturity nor as trading. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Fair value portion of currency on hand as well as demand deposits with banks or financial institutions. Includes other kinds of accounts that have the general characteristics of demand deposits. Also includes short-term, highly liquid investments that are both readily convertible to known amounts of cash and so near their maturity that they present insignificant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest rates. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Total debt and equity financial instruments including: (1) securities held-to-maturity, (2) trading securities, and (3) securities available-for-sale. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Inventory (Details) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
|---|---|---|
| Inventory | ||
| Finished goods - DBS | $ 282,556 | $ 259,274 |
| Raw materials | 116,108 | 122,758 |
| Work-in-process | 124,958 | 82,361 |
| Total inventory | $ 523,622 | $ 464,393 |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Carrying amount, net of valuation reserves and adjustments, as of the balance sheet date of merchandise or goods held by the company that are readily available for sale. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount after valuation and LIFO reserves of inventory expected to be sold, or consumed within one year or operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Carrying amount, net of valuation reserves and adjustments, as of the balance sheet date of unprocessed items to be consumed in the manufacturing or production process. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Carrying amount, net of reserves and adjustments, as of the balance sheet date of merchandise or goods which are partially completed. This inventory is generally comprised of raw materials, labor and factory overhead costs, which require further materials, labor and overhead to be converted into finished goods, and which generally require the use of estimates to determine percentage complete and pricing. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Property and Equipment (Details) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Equipment leased to customers
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Equipment leased to customers
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Equipment leased to customers
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Equipment leased to customers
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Satellites
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Satellites
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Satellites
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Satellites
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Buildings, furniture, fixtures, equipment and other
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Buildings, furniture, fixtures, equipment and other
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Buildings, furniture, fixtures, equipment and other
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Buildings, furniture, fixtures, equipment and other
|
Jun. 30, 2012
148 degree orbital location
|
Sep. 30, 2012
148 degree orbital location
|
Sep. 30, 2013
DBS satellites
satellite
|
|
| Depreciation and amortization expense | |||||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization expense | $ 229,749 | $ 212,931 | $ 663,410 | $ 689,664 | $ 188,524 | $ 165,959 | $ 538,457 | $ 481,876 | $ 27,171 | $ 32,087 | $ 81,512 | $ 96,260 | $ 14,054 | $ 14,885 | $ 43,441 | $ 43,752 | $ 67,776 | $ 67,776 | |
| Number of satellites utilized in geostationary orbit approximately 22,300 miles above the equator | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Owned Satellites | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Number of satellites utilized under operating lease | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Number of satellites utilized under capital lease | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of satellites in geostationary orbit utilized by reporting entity. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of satellites in geostationary orbit utilized by reporting entity owned. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of satellites in geostationary orbit utilized by reporting entity under capital leases. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of satellites in geostationary orbit utilized by reporting entity under operating leases. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The aggregate expense recognized in the current period that allocates the cost of tangible assets, intangible assets, or depleting assets to periods that benefit from use of the assets. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Property and Equipment (Details 2) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
9 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
item
satellite
|
Oct. 31, 2013
Dish Network
EchoStar XVIII Launch Service
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar XII
|
|
| Property and Equipment | |||
| Number of other satellites to be relocated in the event of failure or loss of any satellite | 1 | ||
| Useful life | 18 months | ||
| Number of asset groups considered for impairment of DISH branded pay-TV DBS satellite fleet | 1 | ||
| Amount payable for launch contract | $ 120 |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the amount payable for launch contract. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the number of asset groups considered for impairment of satellite fleet. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of other satellites relocated in event of failure or loss of any satellite. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Useful life of long lived, physical assets used in the normal conduct of business and not intended for resale, in 'PnYnMnDTnHnMnS' format, for example, 'P1Y5M13D' represents the reported fact of one year, five months, and thirteen days. Examples include, but not limited to, land, buildings, machinery and equipment, office equipment, furniture and fixtures, and computer equipment. No definition available.
|
|
Long-Term Debt (Details) (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Jun. 24, 2013
5% Senior Notes due 2017
|
May 28, 2013
5% Senior Notes due 2017
|
Jun. 30, 2013
5% Senior Notes due 2017
|
Apr. 05, 2013
4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018
|
Sep. 30, 2013
4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018
|
Apr. 05, 2013
4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018
Redemption Prior to April 1, 2016
|
Apr. 05, 2013
5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020
|
Sep. 30, 2013
5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020
|
Apr. 05, 2013
5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020
Redemption Prior to May 1, 2016
|
Jun. 24, 2013
6 1/4% Senior Notes due 2023
|
May 28, 2013
6 1/4% Senior Notes due 2023
|
Jun. 30, 2013
6 1/4% Senior Notes due 2023
|
|
| Long-term debt | ||||||||||||||||
| Aggregate principal amount | $ 1,250,000,000 | $ 1,200,000,000 | $ 1,100,000,000 | $ 1,350,000,000 | ||||||||||||
| Term of debt instrument | 4 years | 5 years | 7 years | 10 years | ||||||||||||
| Debt instrument issuance as a percentage of the face amount | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||||||||||||
| Interest rate (as a percent) | 7.00% | 7.00% | 5.00% | 4.25% | 4.25% | 5.125% | 5.125% | 6.25% | ||||||||
| Redemption price as a percentage of principal amount | 100.00% | 100.00% | 100.00% | 101.00% | ||||||||||||
| Maximum percentage of the aggregate principal amount of notes with net proceeds of certain equity offerings or capital contributions | 35.00% | 35.00% | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage of principal amount at which notes may be required to be repurchased in event of change of control | 101.00% | 101.00% | ||||||||||||||
| Premiums, interest expense and deferred financing costs, as applicable | $ 220,596,000 | $ 182,438,000 | $ 663,823,000 | $ 465,554,000 | $ 7,000,000 | $ 23,000,000 | ||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Debt repurchase price percentage in the event of change of control. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Long-term debt issue price as a percentage of principal amount. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Long-term debt redemption with net proceeds from equity offerings as a percentage of principal amount. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Face (par) amount of debt instrument at time of issuance. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Contractual interest rate for funds borrowed, under the debt agreement. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Percentage price of original principal amount of debt at which debt can be redeemed by the issuer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Period of time between issuance and maturity of debt instrument, in PnYnMnDTnHnMnS' format, for example, 'P1Y5M13D' represents the reported fact of one year, five months, and thirteen days. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of the cost of borrowed funds accounted for as interest expense for debt. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Long-Term Debt (Details 2) (USD $)
|
0 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
7 % Senior Notes due 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
7 % Senior Notes due 2013
|
Oct. 02, 2013
7 % Senior Notes due 2013
Subsequent event
|
Sep. 30, 2013
6 5/8% Senior Notes due 2014
|
Dec. 31, 2012
6 5/8% Senior Notes due 2014
|
Sep. 30, 2013
7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015
|
Dec. 31, 2012
7 3/4% Senior Notes due 2015
|
Sep. 30, 2013
7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016
|
Dec. 31, 2012
7 1/8% Senior Notes due 2016
|
Sep. 30, 2013
4 5/8% Senior Notes due 2017
|
Dec. 31, 2012
4 5/8% Senior Notes due 2017
|
Sep. 30, 2013
4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018
|
Apr. 05, 2013
4 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018
|
Sep. 30, 2013
7 7/8% Senior Notes due 2019
|
Dec. 31, 2012
7 7/8% Senior Notes due 2019
|
Sep. 30, 2013
5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020
|
Apr. 05, 2013
5 1/8% Senior Notes due 2020
|
Sep. 30, 2013
6 3/4% Senior Notes due 2021
|
Dec. 31, 2012
6 3/4% Senior Notes due 2021
|
Sep. 30, 2013
5 7/8% Senior Notes due 2022
|
Dec. 31, 2012
5 7/8% Senior Notes due 2022
|
Sep. 30, 2013
5% Senior Notes due 2023
|
Dec. 31, 2012
5% Senior Notes due 2023
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Mortgages and other notes payable
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Mortgages and other notes payable
|
|
| Long-term debt | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Carrying Value | $ 13,861,795,000 | $ 11,615,427,000 | $ 451,448,000 | $ 500,000,000 | $ 1,000,000,000 | $ 1,000,000,000 | $ 750,000,000 | $ 750,000,000 | $ 1,500,000,000 | $ 1,500,000,000 | $ 900,000,000 | $ 900,000,000 | $ 1,200,000,000 | $ 1,400,000,000 | $ 1,400,000,000 | $ 1,100,000,000 | $ 2,000,000,000 | $ 2,000,000,000 | $ 2,000,000,000 | $ 2,000,000,000 | $ 1,500,000,000 | $ 1,500,000,000 | $ 60,347,000 | $ 65,427,000 | |||
| Fair Value | 14,361,700,000 | 12,783,027,000 | 451,498,000 | 521,875,000 | 1,055,050,000 | 1,078,500,000 | 821,100,000 | 844,725,000 | 1,649,595,000 | 1,683,750,000 | 920,250,000 | 940,500,000 | 1,203,000,000 | 1,598,100,000 | 1,669,500,000 | 1,081,135,000 | 2,108,600,000 | 2,280,000,000 | 2,019,900,000 | 2,150,000,000 | 1,393,125,000 | 1,548,750,000 | 60,347,000 | 65,427,000 | |||
| Capital lease obligations | 226,821,000 | 248,304,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations (including current portion) | 14,088,616,000 | 11,863,731,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interest rate (as a percent) | 7.00% | 7.00% | 7.00% | 7.00% | 6.625% | 6.625% | 7.75% | 7.75% | 7.125% | 7.125% | 4.625% | 4.625% | 4.25% | 4.25% | 7.875% | 7.875% | 5.125% | 5.125% | 6.75% | 6.75% | 5.875% | 5.875% | 5.00% | 5.00% | |||
| Debt repurchased | 49,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Principal balance of debt redeemed | $ 451,000,000 |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount equal to the present value (the principal) at the beginning of the lease term of minimum lease payments during the lease term (excluding that portion of the payments representing executory costs such as insurance, maintenance, and taxes to be paid by the lessor, together with any profit thereon) net of payments or other amounts applied to the principal through the balance sheet date. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Sum of the carrying values as of the balance sheet date of all debt, including all short-term borrowings, long-term debt, and capital lease obligations. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of long-term debt before deduction of unamortized discount or premium. Includes, but is not limited to, notes payable, bonds payable, commercial loans, mortgage loans, convertible debt, subordinated debt and other types of debt, with initial maturities beyond one year or the normal operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Contractual interest rate for funds borrowed, under the debt agreement. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Fair value amount of debt instrument that was repurchased. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The fair value amount of long-term debt whether such amount is presented as a separate caption or as a parenthetical disclosure. Additionally, this element may be used in connection with the fair value disclosures required in the footnote disclosures to the financial statements. The element may be used in both the balance sheet and disclosure in the same submission. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The cash outflow for debt initially having maturity due after one year or beyond the normal operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation (Details) (USD $)
|
9 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
DISH Network Awards
|
Dec. 28, 2012
Class A common stock
DISH Network Awards
|
Dec. 02, 2011
Class A common stock
DISH Network Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Class A common stock
DISH Network Awards
|
Dec. 28, 2012
Class B common stock
DISH Network Awards
|
Dec. 02, 2011
Class B common stock
DISH Network Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Long-Term Performance Based Plans
DISH Network Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
Maximum
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
DISH Network Awards
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Stock Options
DISH Network Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
Long-Term Performance Based Plans
DISH Network Awards
|
Jan. 31, 2013
Stock Options
Stock option adjustment 2012
DISH Network Awards
employee
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Restricted Stock Units
DISH Network Awards
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Restricted Stock Units
DISH Network Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Restricted Stock Units
Long-Term Performance Based Plans
DISH Network Awards
|
|
| Stock-Based Compensation | |||||||||||||||
| Stock Awards Outstanding (in shares) | 6,483,500 | 12,321,736 | 13,018,490 | 6,483,500 | |||||||||||
| Restricted stock units outstanding (in shares) | 1,878,998 | 1,076,748 | 1,878,998 | ||||||||||||
| Expiration term | 10 years | ||||||||||||||
| Percentage of stock awards vesting per year (as a percent) | 20.00% | ||||||||||||||
| Shares of common stock available for future grant under stock incentive plans | 69,700,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Dividend in cash per share (in dollars per share) | $ 1.00 | $ 2.00 | $ 1.00 | $ 2.00 | |||||||||||
| Number of stock options subject to an exercise price change in connection with the Stock Option Adjustment (in shares) | 12,900,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Number of employees affected by stock option adjustment | 400 | ||||||||||||||
| Reduction in exercise price due to dividend declaration (in dollars per share) | $ 0.77 | ||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Reduction in exercise price due to dividend declaration. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the number of stock options subject to an exercise price change in connection with the Stock Option Adjustment. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Aggregate dividends paid during the period for each share of common stock outstanding. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Percentage of vesting of share-based compensation awards. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The number of non-vested equity-based payment instruments, excluding stock (or unit) options, that validly exist and are outstanding as of the balance sheet date. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Period from grant date that an equity-based award expires, in 'PnYnMnDTnHnMnS' format, for example, 'P1Y5M13D' represents the reported fact of one year, five months, and thirteen days. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The difference between the maximum number of shares (or other type of equity) authorized for issuance under the plan (including the effects of amendments and adjustments), and the sum of: 1) the number of shares (or other type of equity) already issued upon exercise of options or other equity-based awards under the plan; and 2) shares (or other type of equity) reserved for issuance on granting of outstanding awards, net of cancellations and forfeitures, if applicable. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of options outstanding, including both vested and non-vested options. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The number of employees affected by the modification of an equity-based compensation plan. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation (Details 2)
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
|---|---|---|
|
Stock Options | DISH Network Awards
|
||
| Stock-Based Compensation | ||
| Stock Awards Outstanding (in shares) | 12,321,736 | 13,018,490 |
|
Stock Options | DISH Network Awards | Held by DISH DBS employees
|
||
| Stock-Based Compensation | ||
| Stock Awards Outstanding (in shares) | 12,321,736 | |
|
Stock Options | EchoStar awards | Held by DISH DBS employees
|
||
| Stock-Based Compensation | ||
| Stock Awards Outstanding (in shares) | 547,361 | |
|
Restricted Stock Units | DISH Network Awards | Held by DISH DBS employees
|
||
| Stock-Based Compensation | ||
| Stock Awards Outstanding (in shares) | 1,878,998 | |
|
Restricted Stock Units | EchoStar awards | Held by DISH DBS employees
|
||
| Stock-Based Compensation | ||
| Stock Awards Outstanding (in shares) | 42,288 |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of options outstanding, including both vested and non-vested options. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The number of shares into which fully or partially vested stock options outstanding as of the balance sheet date can be currently converted under the option plan. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The weighted-average price as of the balance sheet date at which grantees can acquire the shares reserved for issuance on vested portions of options outstanding and currently exercisable under the stock option plan. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
For presentations that combine terminations, the number of shares under options that were cancelled during the reporting period as a result of occurrence of a terminating event specified in contractual agreements pertaining to the stock option plan or that expired. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Weighted average price of options that were either forfeited or expired. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Net number of share options (or share units) granted during the period. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of options outstanding, including both vested and non-vested options. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Weighted average price at which grantees can acquire the shares reserved for issuance under the stock option plan. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Weighted average price at which option holders acquired shares when converting their stock options into shares. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Weighted average per share amount at which grantees can acquire shares of common stock by exercise of options. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of share options (or share units) exercised during the current period. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation (Details 4) (Stock Options, USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
|
|
Stock Options
|
||||
| Stock-Based Compensation | ||||
| Tax benefit from stock awards exercised | $ 16,452 | $ 3,342 | $ 32,660 | $ 14,872 |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Disclosure of the aggregate tax benefit realized from the exercise of stock options and the conversion of similar instruments during the annual period. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation (Details 5) (Stock Options, DISH Network Awards, USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Sep. 30, 2013
|
|---|---|
|
Stock Options | DISH Network Awards
|
|
| Aggregate intrinsic value | |
| Aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding | $ 279,491 |
| Aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercisable | $ 111,219 |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of difference between fair value of the underlying shares reserved for issuance and exercise price of vested portions of options outstanding and currently exercisable. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount by which the current fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of options outstanding. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The number of equity-based payment instruments, excluding stock (or unit) options, that were forfeited during the reporting period. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Weighted average fair value as of the grant date of equity-based award plans other than stock (unit) option plans that were not exercised or put into effect as a result of the occurrence of a terminating event. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The number of grants made during the period on other than stock (or unit) option plans (for example, phantom stock or unit plan, stock or unit appreciation rights plan, performance target plan). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The weighted average fair value at grant date for nonvested equity-based awards issued during the period on other than stock (or unit) option plans (for example, phantom stock or unit plan, stock or unit appreciation rights plan, performance target plan). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The number of non-vested equity-based payment instruments, excluding stock (or unit) options, that validly exist and are outstanding as of the balance sheet date. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The weighted average fair value of nonvested awards on equity-based plans excluding option plans (for example, phantom stock or unit plan, stock or unit appreciation rights plan, revenue or profit achievement stock award plan) for which the employer is contingently obligated to issue equity instruments or transfer assets to an employee who has not yet satisfied service or performance criteria necessary to gain title to proceeds from the sale of the award or underlying shares or units. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The number of equity-based payment instruments, excluding stock (or unit) options, that vested during the reporting period. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The weighted average fair value as of grant date pertaining to an equity-based award plan other than a stock (or unit) option plan for which the grantee gained the right during the reporting period, by satisfying service and performance requirements, to receive or retain shares or units, other instruments, or cash in accordance with the terms of the arrangement. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation (Details 7) (USD $)
In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Long-Term Performance Based Plans
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Long-Term Performance Based Plans
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Long-Term Performance Based Plans
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Long-Term Performance Based Plans
|
Dec. 31, 2005
LTIP 2005
|
Sep. 30, 2013
LTIP 2005
|
Sep. 30, 2012
LTIP 2008
|
Sep. 30, 2013
LTIP 2008
|
Sep. 30, 2012
LTIP 2008
|
Jun. 30, 2013
LTIP 2008
|
Sep. 30, 2013
2013 LTIP
|
Sep. 30, 2013
2013 LTIP
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Other Employee Performance Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Other Employee Performance Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Other Employee Performance Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Other Employee Performance Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
DISH Network Awards
Long-Term Performance Based Plans
|
Sep. 30, 2013
DISH Network Awards
2013 LTIP
|
Sep. 30, 2013
DISH Network Awards
Other Employee Performance Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
DISH Network Awards
Held by DISH DBS employees
LTIP 2005
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar awards
Held by DISH DBS employees
LTIP 2005
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
DISH Network Awards
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Stock Options
DISH Network Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
DISH Network Awards
Long-Term Performance Based Plans
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
DISH Network Awards
LTIP 2005
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
DISH Network Awards
2013 LTIP
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
DISH Network Awards
Other Employee Performance Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
DISH Network Awards
Held by DISH DBS employees
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
EchoStar awards
Held by DISH DBS employees
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Restricted Stock Units
DISH Network Awards
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Restricted Stock Units
DISH Network Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Restricted Stock Units
DISH Network Awards
Long-Term Performance Based Plans
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Restricted Stock Units
DISH Network Awards
LTIP 2005
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Restricted Stock Units
DISH Network Awards
2013 LTIP
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Restricted Stock Units
DISH Network Awards
Other Employee Performance Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Restricted Stock Units
DISH Network Awards
Held by DISH DBS employees
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Restricted Stock Units
EchoStar awards
Held by DISH DBS employees
|
|
| 2005 LTIP Terms | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Awards vesting period | 7 years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage awards vesting per annum during first four years | 10.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage awards vesting per annum after first four years | 20.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based expense | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unrecognized compensation expense relating to long-term performance based incentive awards | $ 37,912 | $ 32,321 | $ 5,591 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Unrecognized non-cash stock-based compensation expense on vested portion | 36,031 | 30,629 | 5,402 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Share-based compensation additional disclosures | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Portion vested (as a percent) | 100.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of performance goals probable of achievement | 20.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Recognized non-cash stock-based compensation expense | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-cash stock-based compensation expense recognized | 10,552 | 6,092 | 25,328 | 34,936 | 7,753 | 3,497 | 13,335 | 15,526 | 2,218 | 2,719 | 9,675 | 6,567 | 6,567 | 1,186 | 1,279 | 4,049 | 5,851 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated Remaining Non-Cash, Stock-Based Compensation Expense | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Remaining expense estimated to be recognized during 2013 | 2,234 | 231 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Estimated contingent expense subsequent to 2013 | 58,223 | 41,929 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total estimated remaining expense over the term of plan | $ 60,457 | $ 42,160 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Outstanding awards pursuant to performance-based stock incentive plans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Performance Based Stock Options (in shares) | 6,483,500 | 12,321,736 | 13,018,490 | 6,483,500 | 1,878,500 | 1,935,000 | 2,670,000 | 12,321,736 | 547,361 | 1,878,998 | 42,288 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weighted-Average Exercise Price (in dollars per share) | $ 24.94 | $ 22.33 | $ 18.99 | $ 24.94 | $ 20.83 | $ 36.48 | $ 19.46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Restricted Performance Units (in shares) | 1,878,998 | 1,076,748 | 1,878,998 | 211,498 | 967,500 | 700,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the share based payment award estimated remaining compensation cost. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Share based compensation arrangement by share based payment award estimated remaining compensation cost after next fiscal year. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Share based compensation arrangement by share based payment award estimated remaining compensation cost for remainder of fiscal year. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Share based compensation arrangement by share based payment award, percentage awards vested per year after first four years. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Share based compensation arrangement by share based payment award, percentage awards vested per year during first four years. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Share based compensation arrangement by share based payment award percentage of performance goals probable of achievement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the share based payment award portion vested during the period. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Total unrecognized non-cash stock-based compensation expense. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Unrecognized non-cash stock-based compensation expense on vested portion. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the expense recognized during the period arising from equity-based compensation arrangements (for example, shares of stock, unit, stock options or other equity instruments) with employees, directors and certain consultants qualifying for treatment as employees. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Period which an employee's right to exercise an award is no longer contingent on satisfaction of either a service condition, market condition or a performance condition, in 'PnYnMnDTnHnMnS' format, for example, 'P1Y5M13D' represents the reported fact of one year, five months, and thirteen days. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The number of non-vested equity-based payment instruments, excluding stock (or unit) options, that validly exist and are outstanding as of the balance sheet date. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of options outstanding, including both vested and non-vested options. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Weighted average price at which grantees can acquire the shares reserved for issuance under the stock option plan. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation (Details 8) (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Non-Performance Based Stock Awards
|
Mar. 31, 2013
Stock option adjustment 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock option adjustment 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Subscriber-related
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Subscriber-related
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Subscriber-related
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Subscriber-related
|
Sep. 30, 2013
General and administrative
|
Sep. 30, 2012
General and administrative
|
Sep. 30, 2013
General and administrative
|
Sep. 30, 2012
General and administrative
|
|
| Stock-Based Compensation | |||||||||||||||
| Non-cash, stock-based compensation | $ 10,552,000 | $ 6,092,000 | $ 25,328,000 | $ 34,936,000 | $ 4,000,000 | $ 941,000 | $ 312,000 | $ 1,610,000 | $ 1,506,000 | $ 9,611,000 | $ 5,780,000 | $ 23,718,000 | $ 33,430,000 | ||
| Adjustment to recognized non-cash, stock-based compensation expense to be expensed over the remaining vesting period | 3,000,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Unrecognized compensation expense | $ 15,000,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Future forfeiture rate (as a percent) | 3.70% | ||||||||||||||
| Weighted average period for recognition of compensation cost | 2 years | ||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Adjustment to recognized non-cash, stock-based compensation expense to be expensed over the remaining vesting period. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Share based compensation arrangement by share based payment award estimated future forfeiture rate. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the expense recognized during the period arising from equity-based compensation arrangements (for example, shares of stock, unit, stock options or other equity instruments) with employees, directors and certain consultants qualifying for treatment as employees. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Unrecognized cost of unvested share-based compensation awards. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Weighted average period over which unrecognized compensation is expected to be recognized for equity-based compensation plans, in 'PnYnMnDTnHnMnS' format, for example, 'P1Y5M13D' represents the reported fact of one year, five months, and thirteen days. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Stock-Based Compensation (Details 9) (USD $)
|
0 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Dec. 28, 2012
Class A common stock
DISH Network Awards
|
Dec. 02, 2011
Class A common stock
DISH Network Awards
|
Dec. 28, 2012
Class B common stock
DISH Network Awards
|
Dec. 02, 2011
Class B common stock
DISH Network Awards
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Stock Options
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Stock Options
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
Maximum
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Stock Options
Maximum
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Stock Options
Minimum
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Stock Options
Minimum
|
|
| Black-Scholes option valuation model, assumptions | ||||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate, low end of range (as a percent) | 0.91% | 0.41% | ||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate, high end of range (as a percent) | 1.93% | 1.29% | ||||||||||
| Risk-free interest rate (as a percent) | 0.78% | |||||||||||
| Volatility factor, low end of range (as a percent) | 32.37% | 33.15% | ||||||||||
| Volatility factor, high end of range (as a percent) | 39.87% | 39.34% | ||||||||||
| Volatility factor (as a percent) | 38.90% | |||||||||||
| Expected term of options | 5 years 9 months 18 days | 10 years | 5 years 10 months 24 days | 5 years 8 months 12 days | 3 years 1 month 6 days | |||||||
| Weighted-average fair value of options granted (in dollars per share) | $ 11.44 | $ 16.85 | $ 12.69 | $ 14.49 | $ 6.72 | |||||||
| Granted (in shares) | 0 | |||||||||||
| Dividend in cash per share (in dollars per share) | $ 1.00 | $ 2.00 | $ 1.00 | $ 2.00 | ||||||||
| Dividend yield (as a percent) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | ||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Aggregate dividends paid during the period for each share of common stock outstanding. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The estimated dividend rate (a percentage of the share price) to be paid (expected dividends) to holders of the underlying shares over the option's term. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Expected term of share-based compensation awards, in 'PnYnMnDTnHnMnS' format, for example, 'P1Y5M13D' represents the reported fact of one year, five months, and thirteen days. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The estimated measure of the percentage by which a share price is expected to fluctuate during a period. Volatility also may be defined as a probability-weighted measure of the dispersion of returns about the mean. The volatility of a share price is the standard deviation of the continuously compounded rates of return on the share over a specified period. That is the same as the standard deviation of the differences in the natural logarithms of the stock prices plus dividends, if any, over the period. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The estimated measure of the maximum percentage by which a share price is expected to fluctuate during a period. Volatility also may be defined as a probability-weighted measure of the dispersion of returns about the mean. The volatility of a share price is the standard deviation of the continuously compounded rates of return on the share over a specified period. That is the same as the standard deviation of the differences in the natural logarithms of the stock prices plus dividends, if any, over the period. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The estimated measure of the minimum percentage by which a share price is expected to fluctuate during a period. Volatility also may be defined as a probability-weighted measure of the dispersion of returns about the mean. The volatility of a share price is the standard deviation of the continuously compounded rates of return on the share over a specified period. That is the same as the standard deviation of the differences in the natural logarithms of the stock prices plus dividends, if any, over the period. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The risk-free interest rate assumption that is used in valuing an option on its own shares. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The maximum risk-free interest rate assumption that is used in valuing an option on its own shares. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The minimum risk-free interest rate assumption that is used in valuing an option on its own shares. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Gross number of share options (or share units) granted during the period. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the reporting period as calculated by applying the disclosed option pricing methodology. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the aggregate bid price quoted by the entity in an auction. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the amount to be reimbursed on confirmation of the order issued by Bankruptcy Court as a qualified bidder, if the subsidiary is not the successful bidder at the auction. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the maximum bid price per unit quoted by the entity in an auction. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the amount of break-up fee to be paid on confirmation of the order issued by Bankruptcy Court as a qualified bidder. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Wireless spectrum licenses accelerated period to meet final build-out requirement on failure to meet interim build out requirement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Wireless spectrum licenses accelerated period to meet Modified 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement on failure to meet Modified 700 MHz Interim Build-Out Requirement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the extension term of wireless spectrum licenses final build-out requirement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Wireless spectrum licenses minimum final build-out requirement geographic area percentage. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the minimum percentage of population in each area covered by an individual license to which the entity must provide terrestrial signal coverage and offer terrestrial service by the end of license term. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Wireless spectrum licenses minimum interim build-out requirement geographic area percentage. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the minimum percentage of population in each area covered by an individual license to which the entity must provide terrestrial signal coverage and offer terrestrial service within some specified period. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the minimum percentage of E Block population in each area covered by an individual license to which the entity must provide terrestrial signal coverage and offer terrestrial service by the end of license term. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the minimum percentage of E Block population in each area covered by an individual license to which the entity must provide terrestrial signal coverage and offer terrestrial service within some specified period. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the minimum period for approval prior to the commencement of the FCC's planned H Block auction. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Percentage of voting equity interests acquired at the acquisition date in the business combination. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of consideration transferred, consisting of acquisition-date fair value of assets transferred by the acquirer, liabilities incurred by the acquirer, and equity interest issued by the acquirer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The cash outflow to acquire asset without physical form usually arising from contractual or other legal rights, excluding goodwill. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Details 2) (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 09, 2013
Garnet Digital
item
|
Sep. 30, 2013
LightSquared transaction shareholder derivative actions
item
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Katz Communications-Patent infringement
item
Patent
|
Dec. 31, 2007
Katz Communications-Patent infringement
Patent
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Satellite lease guarantees
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Satellite transponder guarantees
|
Oct. 11, 2012
ESPN-Affiliation agreements
|
Apr. 30, 2009
ESPN-Affiliation agreements
|
Mar. 31, 2013
ESPN-Affiliation agreements
|
Dec. 31, 2012
ESPN-Affiliation agreements
|
Dec. 31, 2011
ESPN-Affiliation agreements
|
Dec. 31, 2008
ESPN-Affiliation agreements
|
Jun. 21, 2011
ESPN-Affiliation agreements
|
Dec. 31, 2010
ESPN-Affiliation agreements
|
Mar. 15, 2010
ESPN-Affiliation agreements
|
Jul. 31, 2009
Technology Development Licensing
item
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Pragmatus
Minimum
item
|
May 31, 2012
Hopper litigation
Maximum
|
Aug. 06, 2013
Harbinger
Minimum
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Norman IP Holdings
item
|
|
| Loss contingencies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Guarantees for payments | $ 63,000,000 | $ 391,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Guarantee term | P17M | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Claim amount | 30,000,000 | 35,000,000 | 4,000,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Court ruling | 66,000,000 | 66,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Litigation accrual | 71,000,000 | 42,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Attorneys' fees | 5,000,000 | 71,000,000 | 24,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative expenses | 154,378,000 | 153,408,000 | 452,678,000 | 469,985,000 | 5,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Payment of accrued interest | $ 12,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of companies against whom similar complaints brought | 15 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of days to store HD primetime programs recordings | 8 days | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of shareholders who filed lawsuits | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Loss Contingency Terms | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of patents the suit alleges infringement of | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of patents remain in the lawsuit | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of reexamination petitions pending before patent and trademark office | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Minimum number of autonomous streamlined signal processors | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Loss contingency court ruling. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the payments made in the period in relation to interest accrued on litigation accrual. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the minimum number of autonomous streamlined signal processors. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the number of days to store HD primetime programs recordings. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents number of patents remaining in the lawsuit after transfer and consolidation of the case for pretrial purposes in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of reexamination petitions pending before patent and trademark office. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The aggregate total of expenses of managing and administering the affairs of an entity, including affiliates of the reporting entity, which are not directly or indirectly associated with the manufacture, sale or creation of a product or product line. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Maximum potential amount of future payments (undiscounted) the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee or each group of similar guarantees before reduction for potential recoveries under recourse or collateralization provisions. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Describe the approximate term of the guarantee or each group of similar guarantees. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of litigation expense, including but not limited to legal, forensic, accounting, and investigative fees. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of loss contingency liability. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The value (monetary amount) of the award the plaintiff seeks in the legal matter. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of defendants named in a legal action. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of plaintiffs that have filed claims pertaining to a loss contingency. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Number of another entity's patents that the entity has allegedly infringed. No definition available.
|
|
Related Party Transactions (Details) (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Dec. 02, 2012
Dish Network
|
Oct. 02, 2012
Dish Network
|
Dec. 31, 2012
Dish Network
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Dish Network
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Dish Network
|
Dec. 02, 2012
Dish Network
Class A common stock
|
Dec. 02, 2012
Dish Network
Class B common stock
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Blockbuster, Inc.
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Blockbuster, Inc.
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Blockbuster, Inc.
|
Sep. 30, 2012
Blockbuster, Inc.
|
|
| Related Party Transactions with DISH Network | |||||||||||||||
| Distribution to DOC of the assets and liabilities associated with satellite broadband business | $ 66,000,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Net satellite broadband assets distributed to DISH Network | 9,000,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Deemed dividend | 57,000,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Dividend declared (in dollars per share) | $ 1.00 | $ 1.00 | |||||||||||||
| Aggregate dividend declared | 453,000,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Dividend paid to DOC | 850,000,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Subscriber-related expenses | 1,938,142,000 | 1,808,833,000 | 5,718,781,000 | 5,396,828,000 | 3,000,000 | 6,000,000 | 11,000,000 | 16,000,000 | |||||||
| Subscriber-related revenue | $ 3,408,510,000 | $ 3,261,324,000 | $ 10,131,098,000 | $ 9,769,646,000 | $ 5,000,000 | $ 11,000,000 | |||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the amount of deemed dividends distributed during the period. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the net assets distributed to parent in noncash investing and financing activities. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to distribution to DOC of the assets and liabilities associated with satellite broadband business. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Aggregate dividends declared during the period for each share of common stock outstanding. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Costs incurred and are directly related to generating revenues in fulfilling customer subscriptions. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of paid and unpaid common stock dividends declared with the form of settlement in cash. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Cash outflow in the form of capital distributions and dividends to common shareholders, preferred shareholders and noncontrolling interests. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Revenue from circulation or sale of subscriptions (for example, but not limited to, subscriptions to a magazine or newspaper). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
|
Related Party Transactions (Details 2) (EchoStar)
|
9 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Remanufactured Receiver Agreement
|
Jan. 31, 2013
Professional Services Agreement
Dish Network
|
Sep. 30, 2013
Professional Services Agreement
Dish Network
|
Jan. 31, 2013
Management Services Agreement
Dish Network
|
Sep. 30, 2013
El Paso Lease Agreement
item
|
Dec. 31, 2008
Varick Sublease Agreement
Dish Network
|
May 31, 2013
EchoStar XV
|
|
| Equipment sales, services and other revenue - EchoStar | |||||||
| Minimum required notice period for termination of agreement by related party | 60 days | ||||||
| Agreement term | 1 year | 1 year | 7 years | ||||
| Automatic renewal period | 1 year | ||||||
| Minimum notice period for termination of agreement | 60 days | ||||||
| Minimum notice period for termination of a specific service | 30 days | ||||||
| Additional term of renewal option | 3 years | ||||||
| Number of consecutive three year renewal options | 4 | ||||||
| Notice period to exercise option to extend agreement | 3 years |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the additional term of renewal option. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the related party transactions automatic renewal period. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the maximum number of three year renewal options under related party transactions agreement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to required notice period for termination of agreement from related party under related party transactions agreement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the related party transactions renewal option term. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the related party transactions agreement term. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the minimum notice period for termination of agreement under the related party transactions. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to minimum notice period for termination of a specific service under related party transactions. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Related Party Transactions (Details 3) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
9 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar XVI
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
Broadcast Agreement
Minimum
|
May 31, 2010
EchoStar
Certain Sports Related Programming Broadcast Agreement
|
Dec. 21, 2012
EchoStar
EchoStar XVI
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
EchoStar XVI
|
Dec. 31, 2009
EchoStar
EchoStar XVI
|
Dec. 31, 2009
EchoStar
DISH Nimiq 5 Agreement
transponder
|
Sep. 30, 2012
EchoStar
QuetzSat-1 Lease Agreement
transponder
|
Dec. 31, 2008
EchoStar
QuetzSat-1 Lease Agreement
transponder
|
May 31, 2012
EchoStar
103 degree orbital location member
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
103 degree orbital location member
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
103 degree orbital location member
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
TT&C Agreement
|
|
| Satellite and transmission expenses - EchoStar | |||||||||||||
| Required notice period for termination by the reporting entity | 60 days | 60 days | |||||||||||
| Agreement term | 10 years | 10 years | 10 years | ||||||||||
| Payments to the related party | $ 23 | ||||||||||||
| Net book value of asset | 20 | 20 | |||||||||||
| Capital distribution | $ 3 | ||||||||||||
| Agreement term from commencement of service date | 4 years | 10 years | 10 years | ||||||||||
| Notice period to exercise option to extend agreement | 6 years | 6 years | |||||||||||
| Additional term of renewal option | 5 years | ||||||||||||
| Agreement term with third party | 15 years | 10 years | |||||||||||
| Number of DBS transponders available to receive services | 32 | ||||||||||||
| Number of DBS transponders currently used | 32 | 32 | |||||||||||
| Number of DBS transponders expected to receive services | 24 | ||||||||||||
| Number of transponders subleased | 5 | ||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Capital distribution to related party. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the amount of expenses, fees and commissions paid for transactions between the related parties. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the additional term of renewal option. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the related party transactions renewal option term. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the related party transactions agreement term. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the related party transactions agreement term from commencement of service date. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to required notice period for termination of agreement by the reporting entity under the related party transactions agreement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the related party transactions agreement term with third party. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the number of DBS transponders available to receive services under the related party transactions agreement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the number of DBS transponders expected to receive services under the related party transactions agreement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the number of transponders subleased under the related party transactions agreement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the number of DBS transponders currently used under related party transactions agreement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount after amortization of assets, excluding financial assets and goodwill, lacking physical substance with a finite life. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Related Party Transactions (Details 4)
|
9 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
DISH Online.com Services Agreement
item
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
Product Support Agreement
Minimum
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
Inverness Lease Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
Santa Fe Lease Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
Gilbert Lease Agreement
|
Nov. 30, 2012
EchoStar
DISH Online.com Services Agreement
|
Jan. 31, 2010
EchoStar
DISH Online.com Services Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
DISH Online.com Services Agreement
|
Feb. 23, 2010
EchoStar
DISH Remote Access Services Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
DISH Remote Access Services Agreement
|
Feb. 23, 2010
EchoStar
Sling Service Services Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
Sling Service Services Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
Application Development Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
XiP Encryption Agreement
|
|
| General and administrative expenses - EchoStar | ||||||||||||||
| Required notice period for termination by the reporting entity | 60 days | 120 days | 120 days | 120 days | ||||||||||
| Required notice period for termination of agreement | 6 months | 180 days | ||||||||||||
| Notice period to exercise option to extend agreement | 1 year | 1 year | ||||||||||||
| Minimum notice period for termination of agreement | 30 days | 90 days | 30 days | |||||||||||
| Agreement term | 2 years | 5 years | 5 years | |||||||||||
| Number of successive one year renewal options | 3 | |||||||||||||
| Term of renewal option exercised | 1 year | |||||||||||||
| Automatic renewal period | 1 year | 1 year | 1 year | |||||||||||
| Notice period required to extend the agreement term | 180 days | |||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the related party transactions agreement term of renewal option exercised. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the related party transactions automatic renewal period. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the maximum number of one year renewal options under the related party transactions agreement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to required notice period for termination of agreement from related party under related party transactions agreement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the related party transactions renewal option term. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the related party transactions agreement term. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to required notice period for termination of agreement by the reporting entity under the related party transactions agreement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the minimum notice period for termination of agreement under the related party transactions. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the required notice period to exercise option to extend agreement under the related party transaction. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Related Party Transactions (Details 5) (USD $)
|
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Apr. 29, 2011
EchoStar
TiVo v. Dish Network and EchoStar Corporation
item
|
Jan. 31, 2012
EchoStar
Receiver Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
Receiver Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2012
EchoStar
Receiver Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
Receiver Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2012
EchoStar
Receiver Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
Receiver Agreement
Minimum
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
Tax Sharing Agreement
Dish Network
|
Sep. 30, 2010
EchoStar
RUS Implementation Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2012
EchoStar
RUS Implementation Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
RUS Implementation Agreement
|
Sep. 30, 2012
EchoStar
RUS Implementation Agreement
|
Dec. 31, 2011
EchoStar
Patent Cross-License Agreements
Dish Network
Maximum
|
Sep. 30, 2013
EchoStar
Patent Cross-License Agreements
Dish Network
Maximum
|
|
| General and administrative expenses - EchoStar | ||||||||||||||||||
| Notice period to exercise option to extend agreement | 1 year | |||||||||||||||||
| Notice period required to extend the agreement term | 180 days | |||||||||||||||||
| Required notice period for termination by the reporting entity | 60 days | 45 days | ||||||||||||||||
| Purchased set-top boxes and other equipment from EchoStar | $ 341,000,000 | $ 247,000,000 | $ 947,000,000 | $ 738,000,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Net amount of the allocated tax attributes payable | 83,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Maximum grants receivable | 14,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Cost of sales - equipment, services and other | 24,073,000 | 28,091,000 | 64,789,000 | 70,719,000 | 4,000,000 | 3,000,000 | 6,000,000 | |||||||||||
| Settlement amount | 500,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Initial settlement amount paid | 300,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Aggregate of six annual installment amounts between 2012 and 2017, net of contribution from related party | 200,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Litigation settlement number of annual installments | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
| Contribution from related party | 10,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Percentage of litigation settlement amount to be made by related party annually | 95.00% | |||||||||||||||||
| Payments to third party by related party | 10,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| Payments to third party by related party under extension option | $ 3,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the contribution from related party for initial settlement under the related party transactions agreement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the number of annual installments in the litigation settlement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the percentage of litigation settlement amount to be paid by related party. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Related party transaction aggregate payments to third party by related parties under extension option, less than. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Related party transaction expenses from transactions with related party, less than. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to the related party transactions renewal option term. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents information pertaining to required notice period for termination of agreement by the reporting entity under the related party transactions agreement. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Represents the required notice period to exercise option to extend agreement under the related party transaction. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Portion of the carrying amount as of the balance sheet date of obligations due all related parties that is payable after one year or beyond the normal operating cycle if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Carrying amount as of the balance sheet date of amounts due under the terms of governmental, corporate, or foundation grants. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of judgment or settlement awarded to (against) the entity in respect of litigation. No definition available.
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of loss contingency liability. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount of payments made reducing loss contingency liability. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Other costs incurred during the reporting period related to other revenue generating activities. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Purchases during the period (excluding transactions that are eliminated in consolidated or combined financial statements) with related party. No definition available.
|
|
Related Party Transactions (Details 6) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Dec. 31, 2012
|
|
| Related Party Transactions with NagraStar L.L.C. | |||||
| Amounts payable to NagraStar | $ 308,228 | $ 308,228 | $ 262,843 | ||
|
NagraStar
|
|||||
| Related Party Transactions with NagraStar L.L.C. | |||||
| Purchases from NagraStar | 22,563 | 17,895 | 69,129 | 53,624 | |
| Amounts payable to NagraStar | $ 18,923 | $ 18,923 | $ 21,930 | ||
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Amount for accounts payable to related parties. Used to reflect the current portion of the liabilities (due within one year or within the normal operating cycle if longer). Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Expenses recognized resulting from transactions (excluding transactions that are eliminated in consolidated or combined financial statements) with related party. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|
|
Subsequent Events (Details) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
0 Months Ended | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sep. 30, 2013
|
Sep. 30, 2013
7 % Senior Notes due 2013
|
Dec. 31, 2012
7 % Senior Notes due 2013
|
Oct. 02, 2013
Subsequent event
7 % Senior Notes due 2013
|
|
| Subsequent events | ||||
| Principal balance of debt redeemed | $ 451 | |||
| Interest rate (as a percent) | 7.00% | 7.00% | 7.00% | 7.00% |
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
Contractual interest rate for funds borrowed, under the debt agreement. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Definition
The cash outflow for debt initially having maturity due after one year or beyond the normal operating cycle, if longer. Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef
|
| X | ||||||||||
|
- Details
|